PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^NYATR vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^NYATR vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYSE Composite Total Return (^NYATR) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NYATR achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 17.39% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NYATR has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 10.89%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.25% annualized return.


^NYATR

1D
-0.86%
1M
1.36%
YTD
6.75%
6M
7.74%
1Y
19.48%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
10.89%

NVDA

1D
1.94%
1M
11.41%
YTD
17.39%
6M
19.38%
1Y
54.29%
3Y*
77.51%
5Y*
65.68%
10Y*
69.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^NYATR vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^NYATR
NYSE Composite Total Return
6.75%17.70%15.79%13.77%-9.35%20.68%6.99%25.51%-8.95%18.73%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
17.39%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between ^NYATR and NVDA is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2012

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between ^NYATR and NVDA has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^NYATR vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^NYATR
^NYATR Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
^NYATR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NYATR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NYATR Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
^NYATR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NYATR Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^NYATR vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYSE Composite Total Return (^NYATR) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^NYATRNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.27

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.70

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.19

6.62

+2.57

^NYATR vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^NYATR Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NYATR and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^NYATRNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

1.60

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

1.28

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

1.40

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.63

+0.02

Drawdowns

^NYATR vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NYATR drawdown since its inception was -37.81%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NYATR and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^NYATRNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.81%

-89.72%

+51.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

-20.21%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.75%

-36.88%

+22.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.95%

-66.34%

+45.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.81%

-66.34%

+28.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-7.14%

+6.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-36.20%

+32.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

8.23%

-6.12%

Volatility

^NYATR vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYSE Composite Total Return (^NYATR) is 2.91%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that ^NYATR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^NYATRNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

12.53%

-9.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.58%

25.59%

-17.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

34.16%

-23.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.86%

51.67%

-36.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

49.80%

-32.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


^NYATR and NVDA have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to ^NYATR (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^NYATR dropped -37.81% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

^NYATR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^NYATR and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer