^NDX vs. FEMKX
^NDX (NASDAQ 100 Index) is an index, while FEMKX (Fidelity Emerging Markets) is Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, ^NDX returned 20.95%/yr vs 11.98%/yr for FEMKX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
^NDX vs. FEMKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ^NDX achieves a 17.37% return, which is significantly lower than FEMKX's 21.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NDX has outperformed FEMKX with an annualized return of 20.95%, while FEMKX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.98% annualized return.
^NDX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 17.37%
- 6M
- 17.62%
- 1Y
- 37.01%
- 3Y*
- 25.76%
- 5Y*
- 16.18%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
FEMKX
- 1D
- 5.11%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 21.74%
- 6M
- 24.81%
- 1Y
- 47.25%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
^NDX vs. FEMKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
^NDX NASDAQ 100 Index | 17.37% | 20.17% | 24.88% | 53.81% | -32.97% | 26.63% | 47.58% | 37.96% | -1.04% | 31.52% |
FEMKX Fidelity Emerging Markets | 21.74% | 31.02% | 7.12% | 15.16% | -27.48% | 1.25% | 32.56% | 33.67% | -18.03% | 46.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between ^NDX and FEMKX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 1990 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, ^NDX and FEMKX have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.51, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^NDX vs. FEMKX — Risk / Return Rank
^NDX
FEMKX
^NDX vs. FEMKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^NDX | FEMKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.40 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 3.46 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.85 | 12.40 | -1.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^NDX vs. FEMKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^NDX drawdown since its inception was -82.90%, which is greater than FEMKX's maximum drawdown of -71.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NDX and FEMKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^NDX | FEMKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.90% | -71.14% | -11.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.12% | -13.00% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.93% | -19.13% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.56% | -40.88% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.56% | -43.24% | +7.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -5.05% | +1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.61% | -25.93% | +1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 3.62% | -0.36% |
Volatility
^NDX vs. FEMKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX) is 7.51%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX) has a volatility of 11.94%. This indicates that ^NDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEMKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^NDX | FEMKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.51% | 11.94% | -4.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.84% | 18.90% | -5.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.29% | 21.23% | -3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.76% | 19.38% | +3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.61% | 18.91% | +3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
^NDX and FEMKX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEMKX has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to ^NDX (7.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^NDX dropped -82.90% vs FEMKX's -71.14%.
FEMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ^NDX and FEMKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer