PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^DRG vs. BRK-A
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^DRG vs. BRK-A - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARCA Pharmaceutical Index (^DRG) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRK-A). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^DRG vs. BRK-A - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^DRG
ARCA Pharmaceutical Index
1.80%20.51%2.66%4.87%4.91%19.99%5.48%14.92%4.38%13.16%
BRK-A
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
-5.11%10.85%25.49%15.77%4.00%29.57%2.42%10.98%2.82%21.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^DRG achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-A's -5.11% return. Over the past 10 years, ^DRG has underperformed BRK-A with an annualized return of 8.71%, while BRK-A has yielded a comparatively higher 12.75% annualized return.


^DRG

1D
1.21%
1M
-3.94%
YTD
1.80%
6M
11.61%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
10.85%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
8.71%

BRK-A

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
-5.11%
6M
-3.97%
1Y
-10.50%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
12.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^DRG vs. BRK-A — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^DRG
^DRG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
^DRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^DRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
^DRG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
^DRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^DRG Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-A
BRK-A Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BRK-A Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-A Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-A Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-A Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-A Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^DRG vs. BRK-A - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARCA Pharmaceutical Index (^DRG) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRK-A). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^DRGBRK-ADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

-0.60

+1.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.38

-0.70

+2.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.90

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

-0.71

+2.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.82

-1.19

+5.00

^DRG vs. BRK-A - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^DRG Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the BRK-A Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^DRG and BRK-A, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^DRGBRK-ADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

-0.60

+1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.75

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.67

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.82

-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between ^DRG and BRK-A is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

^DRG vs. BRK-A - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^DRG drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, roughly equal to the maximum BRK-A drawdown of -51.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^DRG and BRK-A.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^DRGBRK-ADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.48%

-51.47%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.23%

-14.43%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-25.98%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.25%

-30.43%

+4.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.21%

-11.50%

+6.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.91%

-9.51%

-5.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

8.66%

-4.32%

Volatility

^DRG vs. BRK-A - Volatility Comparison

ARCA Pharmaceutical Index (^DRG) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRK-A) at 4.28%. This indicates that ^DRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-A based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^DRGBRK-ADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

4.28%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

11.04%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.90%

17.63%

+4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

17.26%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

18.99%

-2.49%