PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^DRG vs. BRK-A
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^DRG vs. BRK-A - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARCA Pharmaceutical Index (^DRG) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-A). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^DRG achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-A's -1.28% return. Over the past 10 years, ^DRG has underperformed BRK-A with an annualized return of 9.27%, while BRK-A has yielded a comparatively higher 13.48% annualized return.


^DRG

1D
3.78%
1M
7.45%
YTD
10.50%
6M
9.71%
1Y
34.16%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
9.27%

BRK-A

1D
1.60%
1M
3.64%
YTD
-1.28%
6M
-0.25%
1Y
2.10%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
13.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^DRG vs. BRK-A - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^DRG
ARCA Pharmaceutical Index
10.50%20.51%2.66%4.87%4.91%19.99%5.48%14.92%4.38%13.16%
BRK-A
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-1.28%10.85%25.49%15.77%4.00%29.57%2.42%10.98%2.82%21.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ^DRG and BRK-A is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 1994

0.35

The correlation between ^DRG and BRK-A shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.41 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^DRG vs. BRK-A — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^DRG
^DRG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
^DRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^DRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
^DRG Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
^DRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
^DRG Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-A
BRK-A Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BRK-A Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-A Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-A Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-A Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-A Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^DRG vs. BRK-A - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARCA Pharmaceutical Index (^DRG) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-A). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^DRGBRK-ADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.04

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

0.23

+2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.95

0.48

+7.48

^DRG vs. BRK-A - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^DRG Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the BRK-A Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^DRG and BRK-A, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^DRG vs. BRK-A - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^DRG drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, roughly equal to the maximum BRK-A drawdown of -51.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^DRG and BRK-A.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^DRGBRK-ADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.48%

-51.47%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.74%

-9.12%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.50%

-14.43%

-10.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-25.98%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.25%

-30.43%

+4.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.93%

+7.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.19%

-9.52%

-4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.31%

4.43%

-0.12%

Volatility

^DRG vs. BRK-A - Volatility Comparison

ARCA Pharmaceutical Index (^DRG) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-A) at 4.05%. This indicates that ^DRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-A based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^DRGBRK-ADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

4.05%

+3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

10.52%

+3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.33%

14.00%

+5.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.48%

17.15%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.66%

18.94%

-2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


^DRG and BRK-A have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^DRG has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to BRK-A (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^DRG dropped -51.48% vs BRK-A's -51.47%.

^DRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^DRG and BRK-A

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer