PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Eyungwa
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


GOVT 50.00%GC=F 20.00%BTC-USD 5.00%VOO 12.50%QQQ 12.50%BondBondCommodityCommodityCryptocurrencyCryptocurrencyEquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Eyungwa, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Jul 19, 2012, corresponding to the inception date of BTC-USD

Returns By Period

As of Apr 3, 2026, the Eyungwa returned -0.56% Year-To-Date and 13.03% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-4.18%-3.84%-1.98%21.98%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
Eyungwa
0.00%-3.80%-0.56%1.06%16.40%14.99%8.59%13.03%
GC=F
Gold
-2.75%-9.15%7.53%19.86%50.19%32.85%21.92%14.34%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
0.11%-4.01%-3.55%-1.41%23.49%18.47%11.96%14.19%
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
0.01%-7.96%-23.54%-45.31%-19.57%33.40%2.82%65.95%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.11%-4.10%-4.65%-2.77%30.43%22.97%13.18%19.05%
GOVT
iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
0.20%-0.92%0.22%0.82%2.46%2.49%-0.22%0.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jul 20, 2012, Eyungwa's average daily return is +0.04%, while the average monthly return is +1.18%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 4.9 years.

Historically, 66% of months were positive and 34% were negative. The best month was Nov 2013 with a return of +33.1%, while the worst month was Dec 2013 at -12.1%. The longest winning streak lasted 8 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, Eyungwa closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Nov 18, 2013 with a return of +7.5%, while the worst single day was Dec 6, 2013 at -6.6%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.64%2.16%-4.50%0.28%-0.56%
20251.59%-0.20%0.52%2.31%1.86%2.30%0.77%1.64%4.00%1.75%-0.15%0.79%18.52%
20240.24%2.87%3.67%-2.37%2.87%1.47%2.05%1.18%2.71%-0.14%3.21%-0.30%18.71%
20236.65%-2.49%6.12%0.83%-0.11%1.41%1.06%-1.52%-3.17%1.79%5.22%3.86%20.85%
2022-4.22%0.44%0.15%-5.50%-1.53%-4.28%3.89%-3.81%-5.00%0.79%3.23%-1.61%-16.60%
2021-0.09%0.26%2.32%2.31%-0.11%-0.22%2.62%1.63%-2.95%4.22%-0.15%0.29%10.40%

Benchmark Metrics

Eyungwa has an annualized alpha of 9.86%, beta of 0.27, and R² of 0.24 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since July 20, 2012.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (58.70%) than losses (29.21%) — typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • Beta of 0.27 may look defensive, but with R² of 0.24 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index — low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
  • R² of 0.24 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index — capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
9.86%
Beta
0.27
0.24
Upside Capture
58.70%
Downside Capture
29.21%

Expense Ratio

Eyungwa has an expense ratio of 0.10%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Eyungwa ranks 55 for risk / return — on par with similar portfolios. You're getting a typical balance of risk and reward. Not a standout, but not a red flag either — a reasonable choice if other factors align with your goals.


Eyungwa Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
Eyungwa Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Eyungwa Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
Eyungwa Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
Eyungwa Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
Eyungwa Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

0.88

+0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

1.37

+1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.84

6.43

-1.59


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
GC=F
Gold
771.662.071.312.559.32
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
530.981.491.231.537.13
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
36-0.44-0.380.96-1.12-2.00
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
581.041.621.231.937.00
GOVT
iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
340.801.171.141.213.10

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Eyungwa Sharpe ratios as of Apr 3, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.79
  • 5-Year: 1.00
  • 10-Year: 1.51
  • All Time: 1.45

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.98 to 1.66, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio is in the top 25%. This signifies superior risk-adjusted performance, meaning the portfolio is delivering strong returns for the level of risk taken compared to most others.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Eyungwa compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Eyungwa provided a 1.97% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio1.97%1.94%1.80%1.59%1.20%0.69%1.35%1.32%1.36%1.11%1.08%1.01%
GC=F
Gold
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.18%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.48%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
GOVT
iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
3.52%3.49%3.14%2.65%1.77%0.96%2.17%1.98%1.97%1.57%1.40%1.25%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Eyungwa. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Eyungwa was 21.07%, occurring on Oct 20, 2022. Recovery took 478 trading sessions.

The current Eyungwa drawdown is 5.27%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-21.07%Nov 10, 2021345Oct 20, 2022478Feb 10, 2024823
-17.53%Dec 5, 201314Dec 18, 2013906Jun 11, 2016920
-12.81%Apr 10, 201386Jul 5, 2013125Nov 7, 2013211
-12.34%Dec 17, 2017374Dec 25, 2018159Jun 2, 2019533
-10.74%Feb 24, 202024Mar 18, 202039Apr 26, 202063

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 5 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.09, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkGC=FGOVTBTC-USDQQQVOOPortfolio
Benchmark1.00-0.00-0.170.150.911.000.52
GC=F-0.001.000.260.060.000.010.46
GOVT-0.170.261.00-0.00-0.11-0.150.28
BTC-USD0.150.06-0.001.000.130.130.63
QQQ0.910.00-0.110.131.000.860.48
VOO1.000.01-0.150.130.861.000.46
Portfolio0.520.460.280.630.480.461.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jul 20, 2012