PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Sector test 2011 - 2016
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Sector test 2011 - 2016, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Jun 19, 2018, corresponding to the inception date of XLC

Returns By Period


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.72%-3.54%-3.95%-2.09%15.95%16.96%10.34%12.24%
Portfolio
Sector test 2011 - 2016
0.54%-5.05%-3.74%-1.90%8.08%13.81%7.27%
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.34%-5.32%-5.20%-4.07%16.69%25.63%9.43%
XLRE
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.29%-6.14%2.17%-1.08%1.18%6.70%3.78%5.98%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.76%-6.43%-4.18%3.83%4.90%6.25%6.59%9.80%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.75%-4.68%-7.86%-8.57%10.93%14.60%6.19%11.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jun 20, 2018, Sector test 2011 - 2016's average daily return is +0.05%, while the average monthly return is +0.91%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 6.4 years.

Historically, 63% of months were positive and 37% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +13.6%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -11.7%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, Sector test 2011 - 2016 closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 24, 2020 with a return of +7.9%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -12.5%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.53%1.02%-6.65%0.54%-3.74%
20254.46%-0.42%-4.26%-1.57%2.58%2.93%-0.61%3.97%3.12%-0.52%2.69%-0.06%12.58%
2024-0.45%4.53%1.85%-5.66%3.66%2.72%3.23%3.15%3.12%-1.97%6.13%-3.56%17.29%
20239.50%-3.82%3.22%1.58%-0.59%6.71%2.60%-1.76%-4.62%-3.24%9.17%5.96%26.06%
2022-7.46%-4.33%4.68%-8.62%-1.75%-7.34%8.50%-4.85%-8.91%3.34%4.99%-6.01%-26.06%
20210.46%1.46%4.48%6.28%0.13%2.97%3.09%2.70%-5.06%6.24%-2.01%5.58%28.90%

Benchmark Metrics

Sector test 2011 - 2016 has an annualized alpha of -0.32%, beta of 0.90, and R² of 0.91 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since June 20, 2018.

  • This portfolio participated in 96.61% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 90.86% of its upside — more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
  • With beta of 0.90 and R² of 0.91, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index — much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
-0.32%
Beta
0.90
0.91
Upside Capture
90.86%
Downside Capture
96.61%

Expense Ratio

Sector test 2011 - 2016 has an expense ratio of 0.12%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Sector test 2011 - 2016 ranks 12 for risk / return — in the bottom 12% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


Sector test 2011 - 2016 Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
Sector test 2011 - 2016 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Sector test 2011 - 2016 Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
Sector test 2011 - 2016 Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
Sector test 2011 - 2016 Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
Sector test 2011 - 2016 Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.57

0.92

-0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.93

1.41

-0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.21

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.41

-0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.39

6.61

-3.22


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
510.921.431.201.515.11
XLRE
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
130.070.211.030.110.37
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
180.280.511.060.280.58
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
280.460.851.110.812.66

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Sector test 2011 - 2016 Sharpe ratios as of Apr 2, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.57
  • 5-Year: 0.45
  • All Time: 0.55

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.00 to 1.70, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Sector test 2011 - 2016 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Sector test 2011 - 2016 provided a 1.80% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio1.80%1.74%1.70%1.62%1.82%1.30%1.53%1.83%1.83%1.48%1.88%0.99%
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.26%1.13%0.99%0.82%1.10%0.74%0.68%0.82%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLRE
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
3.42%3.45%3.43%3.31%3.70%2.61%3.15%3.06%3.78%3.25%4.22%1.09%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.70%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.81%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Sector test 2011 - 2016. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Sector test 2011 - 2016 was 32.32%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 94 trading sessions.

The current Sector test 2011 - 2016 drawdown is 6.15%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-32.32%Feb 19, 202024Mar 23, 202094Aug 5, 2020118
-29.42%Dec 31, 2021199Oct 14, 2022431Jul 5, 2024630
-16.11%Aug 30, 201880Dec 24, 201858Mar 20, 2019138
-14.98%Feb 20, 202534Apr 8, 202572Jul 23, 2025106
-9.17%Mar 2, 202620Mar 27, 2026

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 4.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkXLREXLVXLCXLYPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.580.670.820.860.91
XLRE0.581.000.560.460.500.75
XLV0.670.561.000.510.500.75
XLC0.820.460.511.000.750.84
XLY0.860.500.500.751.000.86
Portfolio0.910.750.750.840.861.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jun 20, 2018