PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


BND 40.00%VTI 60.00%BondBondEquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced when any position deviates by more than 10.0% from its target allocation.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jul 24, 2026, the Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio returned 5.44% Year-To-Date and 9.47% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1M6MYTD1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*ALL TIME*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
-1.21%0.58%7.16%8.22%16.50%17.60%10.92%13.07%8.07%
Portfolio
Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio
-0.76%-0.06%4.34%5.44%11.97%12.81%6.94%9.47%8.13%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
-0.21%-1.00%-0.65%-0.51%2.90%3.67%-0.37%1.38%2.99%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
-1.13%0.56%7.63%9.43%18.10%18.79%11.45%14.46%9.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Apr 10, 2007, Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio's average daily return is +0.03%, while the average monthly return is +0.69%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 8.4 years.

Historically, 67% of months were positive and 33% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +9.1%, while the worst month was Oct 2008 at -11.4%. The longest winning streak lasted 15 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 13, 2008 with a return of +9.4%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -8.0%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.04%0.34%-3.69%6.20%3.20%-0.10%-1.36%5.44%
20252.07%-0.27%-3.50%-0.05%3.46%3.70%1.27%1.89%2.49%1.59%0.42%-0.13%13.49%
20240.62%2.60%2.30%-3.56%3.52%2.20%2.09%1.91%1.77%-1.42%4.44%-2.48%14.54%
20235.49%-2.49%2.76%0.90%-0.18%3.91%2.14%-1.41%-3.87%-2.18%7.45%4.61%17.74%
2022-4.44%-1.90%0.89%-7.05%0.29%-5.58%6.54%-3.33%-7.20%4.37%4.62%-3.84%-16.47%
2021-0.52%1.26%1.68%3.36%0.35%1.85%1.53%1.64%-3.08%4.01%-0.78%2.17%14.11%

Benchmark Metrics

Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio has an annualized alpha of 2.35%, beta of 0.60, and R2 of 0.95 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since April 10, 2007.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (65.58%) than losses (64.38%) - typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 2.35% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • Beta of 0.60 indicates this portfolio moves significantly less than S&P 500 Index - a genuinely defensive profile with reduced participation in both market rallies and downturns.

Alpha
2.35%
Beta
0.60
0.95
Upside Capture
65.58%
Downside Capture
64.38%

Expense Ratio

Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.03%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio ranks 36 for risk / return — below 36% of Portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

1.44

1.31

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

2.07

1.84

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.24

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.82

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.04

7.83

+1.21


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
29
0.781.171.141.092.86
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
56
1.411.981.252.048.86

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk. Learn how to interpret the Sharpe ratio.

The current Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio Sharpe ratio is 1.44 as of Jul 24, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.10 to 1.90, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio provided a 2.25% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.25%2.22%2.23%2.10%2.04%1.58%1.81%2.15%2.35%2.04%2.16%2.22%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
4.02%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.07%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio was 34.99%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 401 trading sessions.

The current Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio drawdown is 1.79%.


Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Related event

-34.99%Mar 2009
1y 5mo1y 7mo
2y 12moOct 2007 - Oct 2010
Financial crisis2007–2009
-22.70%Mar 2020
1mo 2d3mo 24d
4mo 26dFeb 2020 - Jul 2020
COVID crash2020
-21.24%Oct 2022
9mo 20d1y 3mo
2y 1moDec 2021 - Feb 2024
Bear market2022
-11.96%Dec 2018
3mo 4d2mo 27d
6mo 1dSep 2018 - Mar 2019
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-11.75%Apr 2025
4mo2mo 5d
6mo 5dDec 2024 - Jun 2025
2025 selloff2025

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

AI Analysis


The gist

The portfolio is a plain 60/40 split between U.S. equities and core bonds, which is a serious bet that the market can be divided into “growth engine” and “shock absorber” and that this division will keep working. The math is polite about it: some diversification benefit exists, but not much.

The numbers

  • Diversification ratio: 1.10 to 1.16, which is low by platform standards; the 16.6th to 36.9th percentiles say the portfolio is only modestly diversified.
  • Effective asset count: 1.92 of 2, so the weights are balanced, but the correlation structure still behaves almost like two separate sleeves rather than a genuinely blended risk engine.
  • BND and VTI correlation: -0.13; that is helpful, but only enough to make the portfolio less bad in stress, not magically independent.

The good

  • The two positions sit in different economic lanes: Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is mostly duration and credit, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is mostly equity beta.
  • The low cross-correlation means the bond sleeve does real work when equity volatility shows up.
  • The portfolio is simple enough that its risk budget is easy to read without needing a spreadsheet and a cup of patience.

The bad

  • The portfolio still lives or dies on VTI’s 60% weight; its position-to-portfolio correlation of 0.98 says the equity sleeve is the portfolio.
  • The diversification ratio is only slightly above the “not much happening here” zone, so the bond sleeve softens moves more than it changes the risk character.
  • In some sense, the portfolio is two broad market bets wearing different hats.

The ugly

  • A regime with rising rates and falling stocks is awkward here: BND can lose its defensive properties just as VTI is under pressure, and the negative correlation can turn into a much less comforting number.
  • If inflation is the stress, the bond sleeve and the equity sleeve can become disappointingly similar in the worst possible way: both trying to reprice at once.

Next steps

  • Portfolios with this correlation profile are often paired with exposures whose return drivers sit outside nominal rates and broad equity beta.
  • The low DR suggests that most of the diversification work is coming from the asset-class split itself, not from anything more granular.
  • Portfolios like this tend to look best when the bond sleeve is actually allowed to behave like a bond sleeve, which markets occasionally remember to prevent.
AI-generated analysis. Not investment advice. Verify key facts independently.
Was this useful?

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.92, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.10

1.14

1.15

1.14

1.16

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.16, placing it in the bottom quartile across portfolios — positions are highly correlated. Consider adding assets from different classes or sectors to reduce risk.

Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio correlation to the S&P 500 Index

Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio has a 0.97 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007

0.97


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. VTI has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.99, while BND has the lowest at -0.13.

BND
-0.13
VTI
0.99

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio. VTI has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.98, while BND has the lowest at 0.03.

BND
0.03
VTI
0.98

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BNDVTI
BND1.00-0.13
VTI-0.131.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Apr 10, 2007
Diversification Analysis

Find what Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio is missing

See which holdings overlap, where Stocks/Bonds 60/40 Portfolio is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification