PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


BND 60.00%VTI 40.00%BondBondEquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced when any position deviates by more than 10.0% from its target allocation.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 13, 2026, the Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio returned 4.15% Year-To-Date and 7.19% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.50%0.31%8.56%8.85%24.33%19.37%11.84%13.61%
Portfolio
Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio
0.15%1.03%4.15%4.42%13.09%10.76%5.11%7.19%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
-0.12%1.03%0.52%0.91%4.77%4.17%0.03%1.58%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
0.57%1.00%9.62%9.69%26.27%20.60%12.20%15.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Apr 10, 2007, Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio's average daily return is +0.03%, while the average monthly return is +0.56%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 10.3 years.

Historically, 68% of months were positive and 32% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +7.0%, while the worst month was Oct 2008 at -8.5%. The longest winning streak lasted 15 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 13, 2008 with a return of +7.6%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -7.2%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20260.77%0.76%-3.03%4.15%2.22%-0.63%4.15%
20251.58%0.54%-2.32%0.18%2.07%2.97%0.76%1.65%2.03%1.27%0.48%-0.18%11.48%
20240.36%1.26%1.82%-3.17%2.91%1.76%2.19%1.77%1.62%-1.76%3.31%-2.21%10.05%
20234.77%-2.55%2.76%0.81%-0.50%2.52%1.38%-1.16%-3.40%-1.95%6.48%4.26%13.66%
2022-3.65%-1.63%-0.32%-6.02%0.51%-4.27%5.15%-3.14%-6.19%2.51%4.31%-2.83%-15.18%
2021-0.63%0.32%0.70%2.53%0.29%1.54%1.42%1.03%-2.39%2.69%-0.44%1.35%8.60%

Benchmark Metrics

Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio has an annualized alpha of 2.68%, beta of 0.40, and R2 of 0.85 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since April 10, 2007.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (46.36%) than losses (45.13%) - typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 2.68% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • Beta of 0.40 indicates this portfolio moves significantly less than S&P 500 Index - a genuinely defensive profile with reduced participation in both market rallies and downturns.

Alpha
2.68%
Beta
0.40
0.85
Upside Capture
46.36%
Downside Capture
45.13%

Expense Ratio

Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.03%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio ranks 55 for risk / return — on par with similar Portfolios. You're getting a typical balance of risk and reward. Not a standout, but not a red flag either — a reasonable choice if other factors align with your goals.


Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

2.01

1.86

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

2.89

2.53

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.34

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.53

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

11.37

+0.77


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
36
1.181.771.211.654.81
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
67
1.972.671.352.7912.52

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk. Learn how to interpret the Sharpe ratio.

The current Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio Sharpe ratio is 2.01 as of Jun 13, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.54 to 2.41, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio provided a 2.79% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.79%2.76%2.71%2.43%2.23%1.76%2.00%2.34%2.50%2.21%2.28%2.34%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.96%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.03%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio was 22.91%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 176 trading sessions.

The current Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio drawdown is 0.95%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Financial crisis2007–2009
-22.91%Mar 2009
9mo 23d8mo 12d
1y 6moMay 2008 - Nov 2009
Bear market2022
-19.43%Oct 2022
11mo 10d1y 7mo
2y 7moNov 2021 - Jun 2024
COVID crash2020
-16.17%Mar 2020
28d2mo 17d
3mo 15dFeb 2020 - Jun 2020
2025 selloff2025
-8.05%Apr 2025
4mo2mo 3d
6mo 3dDec 2024 - Jun 2025
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-7.87%Dec 2018
3mo 26d1mo 27d
5mo 23dAug 2018 - Feb 2019

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

AI Analysis


Thesis

The portfolio is making the classic two-asset bet: mostly U.S. aggregate bonds, with a large sleeve of U.S. equities, and the implicit claim is that those two things do not usually fail on the same schedule.

The numbers

  • The diversification ratio sits at 1.2–1.3 across horizons, around the 33rd–54th percentile on the platform; that is modest diversification, not much more.
  • The effective asset count is 1.92 out of 2, so the weights are spread, but only in the arithmetic sense.
  • BND (Total Bond Market) and VTI (Large Cap Blend Equities) have correlation of -0.13, which is mildly helpful, though not enough to turn the portfolio into some grand machine of offsetting risks.

What works

  • The portfolio has two genuinely different return engines: rate-sensitive fixed income and broad equity earnings, and those are not the same macro trade in disguise.
  • The low position-to-portfolio correlation for BND, 0.18, means it still does some diversifying work when equities dominate the risk budget.

What does not

  • The diversification benefit is real but limited; the portfolio is still mostly exposed to the broad “U.S. financial conditions” complex, which is a tidy phrase for several things moving together.
  • The 1Y DR of 1.2 being below the longer-run readings suggests the hedge relationship has been a little less helpful lately.

Stress Scenario

  • A inflation-plus-growth scare can make both sleeves unhappy in different ways: bonds through higher yields, equities through discount-rate pressure. The portfolio then discovers that “not perfectly correlated” is not the same as “independent.”

Worth knowing

  • Portfolios with this structure often behave more like a single balanced risk sleeve than like two unrelated sources of return.
  • The correlation profile is simple enough that most of the diversification story lives in the bond/equity split, which is also why the story is so familiar.
AI-generated analysis. Not investment advice. Verify key facts independently.
Was this useful?

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.92, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.18

1.24

1.25

1.25

1.30

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.30, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio correlation to the S&P 500 Index

Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio has a 0.92 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007

0.90


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. VTI has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.99, while BND has the lowest at -0.14.

BND
-0.14
VTI
0.99

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio. VTI has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.91, while BND has the lowest at 0.22.

BND
0.22
VTI
0.91

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BNDVTI
BND1.00-0.13
VTI-0.131.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Apr 10, 2007
Diversification Analysis

Find what Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio is missing

See which holdings overlap, where Stocks/Bonds 40/60 Portfolio is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification