PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Long-Term Disruption
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Long-Term Disruption, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Oct 16, 2024, corresponding to the inception date of BTGD

Returns By Period


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
-0.11%0.61%-0.42%4.03%29.40%18.38%10.55%12.70%
Portfolio
Long-Term Disruption
0.57%0.70%4.55%3.18%65.99%
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
0.24%-0.27%9.70%3.94%89.13%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.47%4.20%3.66%4.63%40.90%31.29%18.51%18.34%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.47%3.97%6.63%10.61%70.14%38.03%20.17%
FNGS
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN
0.89%-0.45%-5.26%-5.75%31.65%35.42%16.39%
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
1.46%-6.05%-12.81%-31.67%18.68%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
1.53%8.94%21.31%34.70%123.35%51.47%28.60%33.21%
ITA
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
-0.91%-3.72%7.03%11.53%56.97%26.67%17.73%15.72%
DFEN
Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares
-2.65%-13.73%13.51%22.93%211.35%63.13%33.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Oct 17, 2024, Long-Term Disruption's average daily return is +0.15%, while the average monthly return is +2.84%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 2.1 years.

Historically, 53% of months were positive and 47% were negative. The best month was May 2025 with a return of +15.2%, while the worst month was Mar 2026 at -9.0%. The longest winning streak lasted 4 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 2 months.

On a daily basis, Long-Term Disruption closed higher 58% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +12.9%, while the worst single day was Apr 4, 2025 at -6.8%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20266.24%-1.26%-8.95%9.44%4.55%
20257.67%-6.56%-5.89%5.45%15.18%9.56%4.11%-0.23%10.19%6.05%-6.47%-0.03%42.99%
2024-1.24%11.92%-1.25%9.15%

Benchmark Metrics

Long-Term Disruption has an annualized alpha of 22.29%, beta of 1.45, and R² of 0.75 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since October 17, 2024.

  • This portfolio captured 248.27% of S&P 500 Index gains and 106.87% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 22.29% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
22.29%
Beta
1.45
0.75
Upside Capture
248.27%
Downside Capture
106.87%

Expense Ratio

Long-Term Disruption has an expense ratio of 0.57%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Long-Term Disruption ranks 51 for risk / return — on par with similar portfolios. You're getting a typical balance of risk and reward. Not a standout, but not a red flag either — a reasonable choice if other factors align with your goals.


Long-Term Disruption Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
Long-Term Disruption Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Long-Term Disruption Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
Long-Term Disruption Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
Long-Term Disruption Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
Long-Term Disruption Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.74

2.23

+0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.40

3.12

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

4.05

+0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.39

17.91

-2.52


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
803.143.841.476.2916.63
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
652.373.211.433.9815.34
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
782.803.481.455.4720.58
FNGS
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN
291.462.101.261.885.55
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
120.340.831.100.681.55
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
944.154.491.619.6135.05
ITA
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
762.933.861.484.3016.55
DFEN
Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares
823.613.541.436.5822.81

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Long-Term Disruption Sharpe ratios as of Apr 11, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 2.74
  • All Time: 1.37

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 2.14 to 3.05, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Long-Term Disruption compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Long-Term Disruption provided a 1.43% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio1.43%1.42%1.02%0.56%0.72%0.36%0.43%0.63%0.58%0.45%0.47%0.43%
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
0.83%0.91%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.82%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
1.01%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNGS
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
3.86%3.36%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.25%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%
ITA
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.47%0.55%0.85%0.93%0.95%0.82%1.07%1.54%1.13%0.91%1.07%1.04%
DFEN
Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares
7.86%8.89%14.12%1.13%0.46%1.89%0.48%0.50%1.07%1.50%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Long-Term Disruption. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Long-Term Disruption was 26.05%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. Recovery took 27 trading sessions.

The current Long-Term Disruption drawdown is 6.19%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-26.05%Jan 24, 202552Apr 8, 202527May 16, 202579
-18.43%Jan 29, 202642Mar 30, 2026
-13.29%Oct 30, 202517Nov 21, 202534Jan 13, 202651
-6.35%Dec 17, 20243Dec 19, 202418Jan 17, 202521
-4.93%Oct 30, 20244Nov 4, 20242Nov 6, 20246

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 8 assets, with an effective number of assets of 7.14, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets indicates a moderate level of diversification, where some assets may have a more significant influence on overall performance.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkBTGDDFENITAFNGSNUKZSMHQTUMSPMOPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.410.590.600.790.660.780.770.900.81
BTGD0.411.000.320.330.350.480.400.510.380.72
DFEN0.590.321.001.000.420.590.450.510.640.66
ITA0.600.331.001.000.420.590.450.510.640.67
FNGS0.790.350.420.421.000.590.720.650.820.74
NUKZ0.660.480.590.590.591.000.640.700.710.84
SMH0.780.400.450.450.720.641.000.800.790.80
QTUM0.770.510.510.510.650.700.801.000.740.86
SPMO0.900.380.640.640.820.710.790.741.000.83
Portfolio0.810.720.660.670.740.840.800.860.831.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Oct 17, 2024