PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
m111
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


WFC 48.00%BAC 40.00%BABA 9.40%1 position 2.60%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in m111, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is never rebalanced.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Sep 19, 2014, corresponding to the inception date of BABA

Returns By Period

As of Apr 3, 2026, the m111 returned -11.21% Year-To-Date and 11.63% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
m111
0.08%-1.77%-11.21%-2.60%16.72%25.23%8.69%11.63%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
0.22%-0.62%-9.71%-1.11%20.65%23.14%7.14%16.38%
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
0.04%-2.34%-13.09%1.15%13.96%32.15%17.98%8.19%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
-1.36%-9.99%-16.73%-35.54%-4.37%9.31%-10.55%4.98%
USB
U.S. Bancorp
0.38%-0.91%0.26%12.74%28.33%19.55%3.33%6.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 22, 2014, m111's average daily return is +0.05%, while the average monthly return is +0.95%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 6.1 years.

Historically, 59% of months were positive and 41% were negative. The best month was Nov 2016 with a return of +18.5%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -23.8%. The longest winning streak lasted 6 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, m111 closed higher 52% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 13, 2020 with a return of +14.3%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -13.7%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026-2.02%-8.02%-2.53%1.08%-11.21%
20258.25%1.11%-8.21%-3.47%7.87%7.21%0.48%5.73%3.71%3.00%-0.49%4.62%32.52%
20240.86%5.52%7.20%-0.57%5.34%-0.55%1.35%0.72%-1.22%7.94%13.99%-7.18%36.84%
202310.33%-3.27%-15.81%2.01%-3.31%5.33%11.16%-9.65%-3.54%-3.47%13.85%10.23%9.57%
20226.22%-3.79%-6.63%-12.13%4.42%-13.33%7.13%0.06%-9.48%15.11%6.33%-11.76%-20.49%
2021-0.17%13.83%8.51%7.07%2.87%-1.66%-5.46%3.57%0.83%11.55%-8.03%0.04%35.33%

Benchmark Metrics

m111 has an annualized alpha of -1.30%, beta of 1.13, and R² of 0.55 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 22, 2014.

  • This portfolio participated in 126.96% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 118.48% of its upside — more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
  • With beta of 1.13 and R² of 0.55, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index — much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
-1.30%
Beta
1.13
0.55
Upside Capture
118.48%
Downside Capture
126.96%

Expense Ratio

m111 has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

m111 ranks 13 for risk / return — in the bottom 13% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


m111 Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
m111 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
m111 Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
m111 Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
m111 Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
m111 Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.65

0.88

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.96

1.37

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.21

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

1.39

-0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.66

6.43

-3.77


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
630.771.111.171.213.25
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
540.480.811.110.682.09
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
33-0.100.201.02-0.18-0.41
USB
U.S. Bancorp
721.081.521.221.985.10

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

m111 Sharpe ratios as of Apr 3, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.65
  • 5-Year: 0.34
  • 10-Year: 0.42
  • All Time: 0.33

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.98 to 1.67, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of m111 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

m111 provided a 2.19% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.19%1.89%2.23%2.60%2.43%1.38%2.98%2.53%2.66%1.80%1.83%1.84%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.23%1.96%2.28%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
2.17%1.82%2.14%2.64%2.66%1.25%4.04%3.57%3.56%2.54%2.75%2.71%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
1.64%1.36%1.96%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USB
U.S. Bancorp
3.89%3.82%4.14%4.46%4.31%3.13%3.61%2.66%2.93%2.16%2.08%2.37%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the m111. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the m111 was 46.48%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 249 trading sessions.

The current m111 drawdown is 14.46%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-46.48%Jan 3, 202055Mar 23, 2020249Mar 18, 2021304
-41.23%Feb 10, 2022431Oct 27, 2023249Oct 24, 2024680
-30.4%Jan 29, 2018229Dec 24, 2018244Dec 12, 2019473
-28.87%Jul 23, 2015141Feb 11, 2016192Nov 14, 2016333
-24.54%Feb 7, 202540Apr 4, 202556Jun 26, 202596

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.50, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkBABAUSBWFCBACPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.440.600.570.610.65
BABA0.441.000.240.230.270.39
USB0.600.241.000.770.790.82
WFC0.570.230.771.000.800.91
BAC0.610.270.790.801.000.95
Portfolio0.650.390.820.910.951.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Sep 22, 2014