PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CONS.1
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in CONS.1, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is May 15, 1997, corresponding to the inception date of AMZN

Returns By Period

As of Apr 11, 2026, the CONS.1 returned 5.42% Year-To-Date and 15.27% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
-0.11%2.78%-0.42%4.03%27.10%18.38%10.55%12.70%
Portfolio
CONS.1
-0.93%0.71%5.42%8.24%13.46%17.60%10.79%15.27%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
-0.91%0.17%11.58%17.17%11.60%10.62%11.08%8.55%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
-1.83%0.40%14.02%24.99%37.82%37.91%23.78%20.76%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
-1.02%-3.64%2.01%-1.66%-10.64%1.32%3.84%8.70%
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
-1.25%-6.37%0.58%4.12%0.92%4.81%8.15%11.80%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
-3.25%-0.99%15.94%7.66%4.21%27.76%23.76%22.92%
DIS
The Walt Disney Company
-0.62%-0.12%-12.83%-8.56%18.11%0.36%-11.59%1.01%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
2.02%14.79%3.28%10.17%28.94%33.62%7.17%22.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since May 16, 1997, CONS.1's average daily return is +0.07%, while the average monthly return is +1.37%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 4.2 years.

Historically, 65% of months were positive and 35% were negative. The best month was Jun 1998 with a return of +22.1%, while the worst month was Aug 1998 at -15.5%. The longest winning streak lasted 8 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, CONS.1 closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 28, 2008 with a return of +10.9%, while the worst single day was Aug 31, 1998 at -11.6%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20265.10%3.61%-5.97%2.95%5.42%
20253.79%2.92%-6.07%0.71%5.90%-0.20%-1.22%1.03%-1.54%0.98%0.93%-0.78%6.13%
20243.74%6.62%2.24%-2.25%2.25%2.16%-0.43%5.55%2.97%-2.44%9.71%-2.54%30.34%
20237.66%-4.59%5.04%3.30%-2.88%5.14%1.82%-1.48%-3.86%1.33%5.86%2.66%20.86%
2022-4.83%-0.06%2.64%-5.14%-6.03%-4.42%9.51%-1.70%-9.24%7.43%2.84%-6.46%-16.01%
2021-5.78%-1.04%5.01%4.10%-0.70%1.02%3.32%2.09%-3.64%4.52%-1.51%6.43%13.85%

Benchmark Metrics

CONS.1 has an annualized alpha of 10.23%, beta of 0.78, and R² of 0.63 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since May 16, 1997.

  • This portfolio captured 105.56% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 67.04% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 10.23% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
10.23%
Beta
0.78
0.63
Upside Capture
105.56%
Downside Capture
67.04%

Expense Ratio

CONS.1 has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

CONS.1 ranks 15 for risk / return — in the bottom 15% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


CONS.1 Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CONS.1 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONS.1 Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONS.1 Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
CONS.1 Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONS.1 Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

2.23

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

3.12

-1.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.42

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

4.05

-1.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.39

17.91

-9.52


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
550.811.331.151.683.41
WMT
Walmart Inc.
811.882.751.345.1614.19
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
17-0.49-0.580.93-0.33-0.62
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
340.120.301.030.410.91
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
370.220.451.050.541.08
DIS
The Walt Disney Company
490.691.161.150.912.17
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
601.011.591.201.834.36

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

CONS.1 Sharpe ratios as of Apr 11, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.28
  • 5-Year: 0.75
  • 10-Year: 1.00
  • All Time: 0.86

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 2.14 to 3.05, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of CONS.1 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

CONS.1 provided a 1.50% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio1.50%1.53%1.44%1.77%1.38%1.28%1.78%1.64%1.95%2.40%2.13%2.55%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
2.66%2.92%3.12%3.12%2.77%2.84%2.99%2.89%3.29%3.23%3.38%3.07%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.75%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.91%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
2.38%2.35%2.34%2.10%2.15%1.96%2.35%2.39%2.36%2.23%2.97%2.91%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.52%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
DIS
The Walt Disney Company
1.26%1.10%0.85%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.22%1.57%1.51%1.43%1.30%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the CONS.1. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the CONS.1 was 41.79%, occurring on Sep 21, 2001. Recovery took 576 trading sessions.

The current CONS.1 drawdown is 3.20%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-41.79%Jan 20, 2000419Sep 21, 2001576Jan 6, 2004995
-32.41%Sep 12, 2008122Mar 9, 2009169Nov 5, 2009291
-26.46%Jul 21, 199842Sep 17, 199847Nov 23, 199889
-22.84%Feb 20, 202023Mar 23, 202076Jul 10, 202099
-22.44%Apr 27, 199973Aug 9, 199976Nov 24, 1999149

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 7 assets, with an effective number of assets of 7.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets indicates a moderate level of diversification, where some assets may have a more significant influence on overall performance.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkAMZNMCDKOPGDISWMTCOSTPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.540.450.450.440.610.480.540.76
AMZN0.541.000.240.190.180.360.260.330.67
MCD0.450.241.000.370.380.320.340.330.57
KO0.450.190.371.000.510.310.340.310.55
PG0.440.180.380.511.000.290.370.330.55
DIS0.610.360.320.310.291.000.320.340.63
WMT0.480.260.340.340.370.321.000.540.63
COST0.540.330.330.310.330.340.541.000.66
Portfolio0.760.670.570.550.550.630.630.661.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from May 16, 1997