PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Jason Ream
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


VGT 70.00%VUG 20.00%VOO 10.00%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Jason Ream , comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Sep 9, 2010, corresponding to the inception date of VOO

Returns By Period

As of Apr 4, 2026, the Jason Ream returned -5.96% Year-To-Date and 19.87% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-2.33%-3.84%-1.98%29.73%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
Jason Ream
0.63%-1.44%-5.96%-5.58%44.24%22.69%14.11%19.87%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
0.11%-2.19%-3.55%-1.41%31.08%18.47%11.96%14.19%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.11%-3.40%-9.29%-7.99%32.91%21.67%11.69%16.20%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.85%-0.78%-5.36%-5.50%49.54%23.50%15.02%21.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 10, 2010, Jason Ream 's average daily return is +0.08%, while the average monthly return is +1.52%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 3.8 years.

Historically, 63% of months were positive and 37% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +14.2%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -11.7%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, Jason Ream closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +12.7%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -13.2%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026-0.66%-2.92%-4.24%1.83%-5.96%
20250.07%-2.78%-8.73%1.23%9.73%8.43%3.86%1.02%6.37%5.41%-3.94%0.12%21.00%
20242.03%5.32%1.65%-5.19%7.40%7.31%-1.28%1.42%2.33%-0.65%6.76%-0.11%29.57%
20239.49%-0.18%8.75%0.17%6.99%6.39%3.00%-1.91%-6.19%-1.77%12.55%4.78%48.78%
2022-7.89%-4.25%3.44%-11.74%-1.67%-9.10%12.88%-5.37%-11.26%6.83%5.24%-7.82%-29.30%
2021-0.80%1.48%1.34%5.51%-1.09%6.52%3.24%3.49%-5.55%8.09%2.26%2.53%29.71%

Benchmark Metrics

Jason Ream has an annualized alpha of 4.09%, beta of 1.16, and R² of 0.90 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 10, 2010.

  • This portfolio captured 127.98% of S&P 500 Index gains and 101.82% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 4.09% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
4.09%
Beta
1.16
0.90
Upside Capture
127.98%
Downside Capture
101.82%

Expense Ratio

Jason Ream has an expense ratio of 0.07%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Jason Ream ranks 33 for risk / return — below 33% of portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


Jason Ream Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
Jason Ream Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Jason Ream Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
Jason Ream Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
Jason Ream Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
Jason Ream Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

0.88

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

1.37

+0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

1.39

+0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.55

6.43

-0.89


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
530.981.491.231.537.13
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
380.781.271.181.133.90
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
571.101.671.231.885.72

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Jason Ream Sharpe ratios as of Apr 4, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.04
  • 5-Year: 0.60
  • 10-Year: 0.87
  • All Time: 0.87

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.99 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Jason Ream compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Jason Ream provided a 0.51% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.51%0.48%0.64%0.71%0.95%0.67%0.86%1.16%1.37%1.10%1.40%1.37%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.18%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.45%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.43%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Jason Ream . A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Jason Ream was 34.14%, occurring on Oct 14, 2022. Recovery took 290 trading sessions.

The current Jason Ream drawdown is 10.48%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-34.14%Dec 28, 2021202Oct 14, 2022290Dec 11, 2023492
-32.04%Feb 20, 202023Mar 23, 202055Jun 10, 202078
-25.41%Dec 17, 202476Apr 8, 202552Jun 24, 2025128
-22.94%Oct 4, 201856Dec 24, 201859Mar 21, 2019115
-18.22%Feb 18, 2011127Aug 19, 2011108Jan 25, 2012235

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 3 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.85, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkVGTVOOVUGPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.891.000.940.92
VGT0.891.000.890.951.00
VOO1.000.891.000.940.92
VUG0.940.950.941.000.97
Portfolio0.921.000.920.971.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Sep 10, 2010