PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
4/2025 [I]
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for 4/2025 [I]

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 4/2025 [I], comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 13, 2026, the 4/2025 [I] returned 9.40% Year-To-Date and 14.11% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.50%0.31%8.56%8.85%24.33%19.37%11.84%13.61%
Portfolio
4/2025 [I]
0.71%3.95%9.40%9.23%14.02%19.72%16.36%14.11%
CAH
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.22%14.68%9.47%13.51%40.25%38.77%33.47%14.31%
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
1.40%-4.44%26.87%24.31%24.65%7.68%18.49%13.66%
CVX
Chevron Corporation
0.75%-1.13%25.18%27.20%33.69%10.25%16.33%10.94%
DGX
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
-0.38%8.82%18.06%12.22%14.71%16.40%11.96%12.33%
ENB
Enbridge Inc.
0.07%2.15%21.23%21.95%27.81%22.21%14.42%9.68%
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
0.38%7.69%7.93%7.67%29.63%21.44%15.92%12.38%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
-1.52%5.40%13.04%13.84%14.07%8.98%9.78%11.37%
MCK
McKesson Corporation
-0.40%3.20%-4.23%-3.47%8.11%26.04%32.74%16.64%
MET
MetLife, Inc.
1.44%11.36%14.21%9.74%18.30%20.82%10.04%14.00%
MKL
Markel Corporation
0.87%0.11%-14.13%-14.86%-4.29%11.11%8.89%7.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Apr 19, 2007, 4/2025 [I]'s average daily return is +0.06%, while the average monthly return is +1.20%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 4.8 years.

Historically, 63% of months were positive and 37% were negative. The best month was May 2013 with a return of +36.3%, while the worst month was Oct 2008 at -16.4%. The longest winning streak lasted 9 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, 4/2025 [I] closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was May 1, 2013 with a return of +23.9%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -10.9%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20267.23%6.85%-1.91%-4.23%-1.74%3.44%9.40%
20253.16%5.37%2.65%-2.04%1.46%1.73%-0.78%4.14%1.73%-2.96%2.93%-0.88%17.40%
20242.76%1.01%4.73%-0.82%2.63%-1.28%4.73%4.32%0.92%-0.81%7.47%-6.89%19.53%
20230.84%-4.17%-1.09%1.18%-5.82%6.06%0.00%0.43%-0.66%3.65%4.58%0.65%5.14%
20223.18%5.50%5.50%-2.83%6.56%-5.12%2.47%0.96%-6.83%15.86%2.88%-2.12%26.87%
2021-1.52%5.14%8.63%2.84%1.19%0.04%0.25%0.09%-1.11%2.13%-3.83%8.16%23.43%

Benchmark Metrics

4/2025 [I] has an annualized alpha of 6.70%, beta of 0.81, and R2 of 0.68 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since April 19, 2007.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (89.79%) than losses (66.06%) - typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 6.70% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
6.70%
Beta
0.81
0.68
Upside Capture
89.79%
Downside Capture
66.06%

Expense Ratio

4/2025 [I] has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

4/2025 [I] ranks 20 for risk / return — in the bottom 20% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


4/2025 [I] Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
4/2025 [I] Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4/2025 [I] Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
4/2025 [I] Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
4/2025 [I] Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
4/2025 [I] Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for 4/2025 [I] and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

1.40

1.86

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

2.12

2.53

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.34

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

2.53

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.91

11.37

-7.46


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
CAH
Cardinal Health, Inc.
79
1.382.241.302.025.31
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
69
0.951.431.171.864.08
CVX
Chevron Corporation
80
1.572.121.272.486.10
DGX
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
64
0.681.191.141.342.79
ENB
Enbridge Inc.
84
1.712.441.303.037.64
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
80
1.442.311.272.157.36
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
60
0.691.051.140.731.69
MCK
McKesson Corporation
49
0.270.631.080.290.74
MET
MetLife, Inc.
61
0.691.041.130.912.48
MKL
Markel Corporation
30
-0.27-0.240.97-0.25-0.60

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk. Learn how to interpret the Sharpe ratio.

The current 4/2025 [I] Sharpe ratio is 1.40 as of Jun 13, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.53 to 2.41, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of 4/2025 [I] compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

4/2025 [I] provided a 2.82% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.82%2.72%2.68%2.86%2.72%3.29%3.32%2.74%3.00%3.07%2.32%2.80%
CAH
Cardinal Health, Inc.
0.91%0.99%1.28%1.98%2.57%3.80%3.62%3.80%4.24%3.00%2.41%1.68%
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
2.82%3.40%3.35%3.37%4.23%2.70%4.23%2.05%1.86%1.93%1.99%6.30%
CVX
Chevron Corporation
3.73%4.49%4.50%4.05%3.16%4.52%6.11%3.95%4.12%3.45%3.64%4.76%
DGX
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
1.61%1.82%1.96%2.02%1.66%1.40%1.85%1.99%2.34%1.83%1.72%2.07%
ENB
Enbridge Inc.
4.91%5.66%6.28%7.31%6.80%6.85%7.55%5.58%6.68%4.71%4.13%4.71%
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
1.69%1.76%2.12%2.01%2.00%2.24%2.90%2.26%2.31%1.61%1.72%1.96%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.53%2.76%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%
MCK
McKesson Corporation
0.42%0.37%0.47%0.50%0.54%0.72%0.95%1.16%1.32%0.80%0.80%0.53%
MET
MetLife, Inc.
2.58%2.85%2.63%3.12%2.74%3.04%3.88%3.41%4.04%14.52%2.92%3.06%
MKL
Markel Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 4/2025 [I]. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the 4/2025 [I] was 46.66%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 475 trading sessions.

The current 4/2025 [I] drawdown is 5.83%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Financial crisis2007–2009
-46.66%Mar 2009
1y 4mo1y 10mo
3y 2moNov 2007 - Jan 2011
COVID crash2020
-35.50%Mar 2020
1mo 4d11mo 7d
1y 6dFeb 2020 - Feb 2021
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-20.34%Dec 2018
10mo 29d5mo 28d
1y 4moJan 2018 - Jun 2019
2011 correction2011
-19.97%Oct 2011
2mo 27d5mo 12d
8mo 9dJul 2011 - Mar 2012
2016 correction2016
-12.81%Feb 2016
6mo 29d2mo 2d
9mo 1dJul 2015 - Apr 2016

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 15 assets, with an effective number of assets of 15.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

2.27

1.96

1.77

1.56

1.61

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.61, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

4/2025 [I] correlation to the S&P 500 Index

4/2025 [I] has a 0.01 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007

0.75


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. MET has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.67, while VZ has the lowest at 0.42.

VZ
0.42
TMUS
0.43
DGX
0.45
MCK
0.45
LMT
0.46
NOC
0.46
T
0.47
ENB
0.48
CAH
0.49
COP
0.51
PGR
0.51
MKL
0.53
CVX
0.55
GD
0.59
MET
0.67

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. 4/2025 [I]. MET has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.71, while DGX has the lowest at 0.52.

DGX
0.52
TMUS
0.53
ENB
0.56
VZ
0.56
MKL
0.60
MCK
0.60
T
0.61
PGR
0.62
LMT
0.62
CAH
0.63
COP
0.63
NOC
0.63
CVX
0.67
GD
0.71
MET
0.71

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Apr 19, 2007
Diversification Analysis

Find what 4/2025 [I] is missing

See which holdings overlap, where 4/2025 [I] is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification