S&P 500 vs 100 vs 50 vs QQQ vs MAGS vs SMH

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in S&P 500 vs 100 vs 50 vs QQQ vs MAGS vs SMH, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is never rebalanced.

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Apr 12, 2023, S&P 500 vs 100 vs 50 vs QQQ vs MAGS vs SMH's average daily return is +0.11%, while the average monthly return is +2.15%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 2.7 years.

Historically, 68% of months were positive and 32% were negative. The best month was Nov 2023 with a return of +11.0%, while the worst month was Mar 2025 at -7.9%. The longest winning streak lasted 6 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, S&P 500 vs 100 vs 50 vs QQQ vs MAGS vs SMH closed higher 58% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +12.4%, while the worst single day was Apr 4, 2025 at -6.2%.

S&P 500 vs 100 vs 50 vs QQQ vs MAGS vs SMH has an annualized alpha of 4.92%, beta of 1.33, and R² of 0.90 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since April 12, 2023.

• This portfolio captured 148.45% of S&P 500 Index gains and 104.14% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
• This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 4.92% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

S&P 500 vs 100 vs 50 vs QQQ vs MAGS vs SMH has an expense ratio of 0.21%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.

S&P 500 vs 100 vs 50 vs QQQ vs MAGS vs SMH ranks 63 for risk / return — better than 63% of portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

S&P 500 vs 100 vs 50 vs QQQ vs MAGS vs SMH Sharpe ratios as of Apr 3, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

• 1-Year: 1.33
• All Time: 1.38

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.98 to 1.66, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of S&P 500 vs 100 vs 50 vs QQQ vs MAGS vs SMH compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.

S&P 500 vs 100 vs 50 vs QQQ vs MAGS vs SMH provided a 0.88% dividend yield over the last twelve months.

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the S&P 500 vs 100 vs 50 vs QQQ vs MAGS vs SMH. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the S&P 500 vs 100 vs 50 vs QQQ vs MAGS vs SMH was 24.22%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. Recovery took 53 trading sessions.

The current S&P 500 vs 100 vs 50 vs QQQ vs MAGS vs SMH drawdown is 7.69%.

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.