PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Multi factor
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Multi factor , comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every year.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Jul 12, 2017, corresponding to the inception date of EQDS.L

Returns By Period


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
Multi factor
-0.21%-3.39%-1.35%1.37%12.25%13.48%9.49%
EQDS.L
iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.13%-1.38%-0.28%1.72%14.13%12.21%9.64%
MVUS.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-0.03%-4.05%-4.06%-1.88%4.54%11.04%8.15%9.82%
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-0.41%-1.68%1.17%6.08%22.03%15.70%11.18%
XDWI.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C
-0.78%-4.55%4.52%6.72%27.08%19.63%11.33%12.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jul 13, 2017, Multi factor 's average daily return is +0.04%, while the average monthly return is +0.86%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 6.7 years.

Historically, 68% of months were positive and 32% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +10.2%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -12.0%. The longest winning streak lasted 11 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, Multi factor closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 24, 2020 with a return of +7.5%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -9.3%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.53%3.15%-7.36%1.68%-1.35%
20253.94%0.14%-1.47%0.18%4.31%2.70%0.12%1.39%1.76%1.01%0.72%1.91%17.89%
20241.97%2.81%3.32%-3.27%3.42%1.99%2.46%2.53%1.96%-1.70%3.18%-4.39%14.79%
20233.19%-2.99%3.25%2.51%-3.00%4.87%2.05%-1.93%-4.11%-2.78%8.28%4.70%14.00%
2022-4.60%-1.35%4.13%-4.36%-1.38%-6.53%5.37%-3.65%-7.39%6.39%5.82%-1.27%-9.69%
2021-1.34%0.85%5.76%3.43%2.00%0.01%2.30%1.56%-4.25%4.04%-0.54%5.77%20.88%

Benchmark Metrics

Multi factor has an annualized alpha of 5.31%, beta of 0.44, and R² of 0.34 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since July 13, 2017.

  • This portfolio participated in 80.66% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 78.21% of its upside — more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
  • Beta of 0.44 may look defensive, but with R² of 0.34 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index — low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
  • R² of 0.34 means the benchmark explains less than half of this portfolio's behavior — treat beta with caution or consider switching to a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
5.31%
Beta
0.44
0.34
Upside Capture
78.21%
Downside Capture
80.66%

Expense Ratio

Multi factor has an expense ratio of 0.25%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Multi factor ranks 25 for risk / return — below 25% of portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


Multi factor Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
Multi factor Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Multi factor Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
Multi factor Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
Multi factor Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
Multi factor Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

0.88

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.21

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

1.39

+0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.61

6.43

+1.17


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
EQDS.L
iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
440.921.281.191.355.01
MVUS.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
250.350.561.080.984.06
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
781.441.951.293.0611.51
XDWI.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C
801.512.121.302.7611.53

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Multi factor Sharpe ratios as of Apr 2, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.91
  • 5-Year: 0.74
  • All Time: 0.70

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.01 to 1.70, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Multi factor compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Multi factor provided a 1.05% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
Portfolio1.05%0.92%0.96%1.07%1.13%1.20%1.09%1.25%1.34%0.29%
EQDS.L
iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.32%2.96%3.16%3.58%4.14%4.63%3.23%4.52%5.06%0.76%
MVUS.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.57%3.12%3.24%3.55%3.56%3.71%3.84%3.98%4.18%1.05%
XDWI.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Multi factor . A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Multi factor was 34.07%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 162 trading sessions.

The current Multi factor drawdown is 5.57%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-34.07%Feb 18, 202025Mar 23, 2020162Nov 11, 2020187
-20.66%Jan 6, 2022192Oct 11, 2022296Dec 12, 2023488
-14.1%Sep 24, 201867Dec 27, 201867Apr 2, 2019134
-12.41%Mar 4, 202525Apr 7, 202523May 13, 202548
-8%Mar 2, 202620Mar 27, 2026

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.67, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkEQDS.LXDWI.LMVUS.LWQDS.LPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.420.520.560.520.59
EQDS.L0.421.000.640.560.730.72
XDWI.L0.520.641.000.690.710.83
MVUS.L0.560.560.691.000.730.95
WQDS.L0.520.730.710.731.000.86
Portfolio0.590.720.830.950.861.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jul 13, 2017