Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | Technology | 20% |
WELL Welltower Inc. | Real Estate | 20% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | Healthcare | 20% |
PLD Prologis, Inc. | Real Estate | 10% |
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | Large Cap Growth Equities | 10% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | Derivative Income | 10% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | Consumer Defensive | 10% |
Find the right asset allocation for Best Dividend Portfolio 2.0
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Best Dividend Portfolio 2.0, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
| Position | 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.30% | 0.09% | 8.18% | 8.17% | 23.42% | 19.88% | 11.91% | 13.45% |
Portfolio Best Dividend Portfolio 2.0 | -1.01% | 2.85% | 8.68% | 6.52% | 31.12% | 27.15% | 17.29% | — |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | -0.30% | 1.64% | 5.28% | 5.66% | 17.72% | 15.15% | 10.72% | — |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | -1.41% | 22.22% | -3.95% | -7.98% | 7.12% | 31.74% | 18.84% | 11.34% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | -0.26% | 5.50% | 13.43% | 16.43% | 53.49% | 16.56% | 10.04% | 10.06% |
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 0.83% | -1.13% | 12.15% | 10.74% | 33.89% | 26.07% | 14.42% | 19.36% |
PLD Prologis, Inc. | -1.22% | -0.91% | 12.74% | 14.51% | 35.80% | 9.00% | 5.89% | 14.19% |
WELL Welltower Inc. | -3.35% | -6.50% | 8.50% | 0.26% | 31.48% | 37.93% | 23.47% | 14.83% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.80% | -8.13% | 7.98% | 6.15% | 23.97% | 34.37% | 22.47% | 19.62% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Dec 15, 2016, Best Dividend Portfolio 2.0's average daily return is +0.06%, while the average monthly return is +1.30%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 4.5 years.
Historically, 66% of months were positive and 34% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +12.6%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -13.1%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.
On a daily basis, Best Dividend Portfolio 2.0 closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 13, 2020 with a return of +8.3%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -11.4%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4.29% | 1.53% | -2.84% | 3.05% | 4.14% | -1.58% | 8.68% | ||||||
| 2025 | 8.74% | 4.35% | -3.09% | -1.61% | 4.00% | 3.20% | 0.84% | 2.72% | 6.43% | 3.74% | 6.54% | -3.08% | 37.12% |
| 2024 | 2.18% | 4.18% | 1.26% | -6.92% | 5.63% | 2.04% | 6.72% | 6.00% | 3.60% | -1.59% | 5.17% | -5.20% | 24.34% |
| 2023 | 3.30% | -2.57% | 1.22% | 3.00% | -1.56% | 5.64% | 3.13% | 0.14% | -3.77% | -1.09% | 7.02% | 3.93% | 19.31% |
| 2022 | -1.80% | -4.42% | 8.85% | -1.91% | -2.72% | -3.89% | 3.02% | -4.78% | -8.16% | 6.88% | 7.96% | -4.94% | -7.42% |
| 2021 | -1.54% | 1.44% | 6.13% | 4.20% | 1.82% | 2.84% | 2.20% | 2.08% | -4.95% | 1.37% | -1.23% | 8.37% | 24.45% |
Benchmark Metrics
Best Dividend Portfolio 2.0 has an annualized alpha of 5.56%, beta of 0.74, and R2 of 0.68 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since December 15, 2016.
- This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (92.94%) than losses (81.02%) - typical of diversified or defensive assets.
- This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 5.56% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
- Alpha
- 5.56%
- Beta
- 0.74
- R²
- 0.68
- Upside Capture
- 92.94%
- Downside Capture
- 81.02%
Expense Ratio
Best Dividend Portfolio 2.0 has an expense ratio of 0.08%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
Best Dividend Portfolio 2.0 ranks 84 for risk / return — in the top 84% of Portfolios on our site. This means strong returns relative to risk — exactly what professional investors look for. Well-suited for investors who want to maximize return per unit of risk.
Return / Risk — by metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Best Dividend Portfolio 2.0 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.76 | 1.94 | +0.82 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.90 | 2.63 | +1.27 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.35 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.92 | 2.59 | +2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.61 | 11.84 | +5.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Position | Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 66 | 1.96 | 2.91 | 1.34 | 2.99 | 10.79 |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 47 | 0.18 | 0.53 | 1.07 | 0.23 | 0.50 |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 95 | 3.19 | 4.65 | 1.57 | 4.91 | 14.52 |
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 65 | 2.06 | 2.68 | 1.36 | 2.69 | 10.57 |
PLD Prologis, Inc. | 85 | 1.70 | 2.47 | 1.30 | 3.75 | 12.35 |
WELL Welltower Inc. | 79 | 1.48 | 2.03 | 1.26 | 2.51 | 6.21 |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 71 | 1.02 | 1.54 | 1.20 | 1.53 | 5.02 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Best Dividend Portfolio 2.0 provided a 2.31% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 2.31% | 2.35% | 2.68% | 2.90% | 3.20% | 2.84% | 3.32% | 3.81% | 3.83% | 3.28% | 2.96% | 3.05% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.43% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 2.40% | 2.27% | 3.03% | 4.05% | 4.68% | 4.74% | 5.17% | 4.80% | 5.46% | 3.85% | 3.31% | 3.63% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.26% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 0.69% | 0.54% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 2.51% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.12% | 1.04% |
PLD Prologis, Inc. | 2.87% | 3.16% | 3.63% | 2.61% | 2.80% | 1.50% | 2.33% | 2.38% | 3.27% | 2.73% | 3.18% | 3.54% |
WELL Welltower Inc. | 1.48% | 1.52% | 2.03% | 2.71% | 3.72% | 2.84% | 4.18% | 4.26% | 5.01% | 5.46% | 5.14% | 4.85% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.81% | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.89% | 3.20% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Best Dividend Portfolio 2.0. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the Best Dividend Portfolio 2.0 was 32.94%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 179 trading sessions.
The current Best Dividend Portfolio 2.0 drawdown is 1.52%.
Related event | Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COVID crash2020 | -32.94%Mar 2020 | 1mo 3d | 8mo 16d | 9mo 19dFeb 2020 - Dec 2020 |
Bear market2022 | -22.32%Oct 2022 | 5mo 22d | 1y 1mo | 1y 7moApr 2022 - Nov 2023 |
2025 selloff2025 | -14.10%Apr 2025 | 1mo 17d | 2mo 3d | 3mo 20dFeb 2025 - Jun 2025 |
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018 | -13.96%Dec 2018 | 3mo 1d | 1mo 8d | 4mo 9dSep 2018 - Jan 2019 |
2018 correction2018 | -11.57%Mar 2018 | 1mo 23d | 4mo 27d | 6mo 20dJan 2018 - Aug 2018 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 7 assets, with an effective number of assets of 6.25, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | 3Y | 5Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 1.96 | 1.70 | 1.58 | 1.45 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.45, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.
Best Dividend Portfolio 2.0 correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016 | 0.70 |
Benchmark Correlations
Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. ONEQ has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.92, while JNJ has the lowest at 0.32.
Asset Correlations Table
Find what Best Dividend Portfolio 2.0 is missing
See which holdings overlap, where Best Dividend Portfolio 2.0 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification