Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | Large Cap Growth Equities | 50% |
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | Emerging Markets Equities | 20% |
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A | Precious Metals | 10% |
XDW0.L Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | Energy Equities | 20% |
Performance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Test PAC 2, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is never rebalanced.
Loading graphics...
The earliest data available for this chart is Mar 24, 2016, corresponding to the inception date of XDW0.L
Returns By Period
As of Apr 3, 2026, the Test PAC 2 returned -0.13% Year-To-Date and 15.32% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.11% | -3.43% | -3.84% | -1.98% | 16.08% | 16.86% | 10.37% | 12.29% |
Portfolio Test PAC 2 | -10.04% | -2.13% | -0.13% | 3.31% | 27.63% | 21.86% | 13.32% | 15.32% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | -1.82% | -2.34% | 2.57% | 5.90% | 31.51% | 15.83% | 4.37% | 8.23% |
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -13.89% | -2.69% | -6.01% | -3.51% | 23.10% | 22.80% | 12.89% | 18.72% |
XDW0.L Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 0.88% | 6.77% | 33.25% | 36.82% | 37.18% | 16.77% | 22.11% | 10.66% |
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A | -2.08% | -8.98% | 8.43% | 21.69% | 48.98% | 32.68% | 21.85% | 14.18% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Mar 29, 2016, Test PAC 2's average daily return is +0.06%, while the average monthly return is +1.28%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 4.5 years.
Historically, 70% of months were positive and 30% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +11.4%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -9.0%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.
On a daily basis, Test PAC 2 closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 1, 2026 with a return of +12.8%, while the worst single day was Apr 2, 2026 at -10.0%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.53% | 0.11% | -5.02% | 1.45% | -0.13% | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2.73% | -3.77% | -3.89% | 0.15% | 7.76% | 6.12% | 2.53% | 1.05% | 5.05% | 4.50% | -0.89% | 0.90% | 23.76% |
| 2024 | 1.34% | 3.58% | 3.06% | -1.96% | 2.71% | 6.45% | -1.29% | 0.24% | 2.68% | -0.01% | 3.69% | -0.21% | 21.91% |
| 2023 | 8.80% | -1.81% | 6.12% | 1.00% | 3.91% | 5.53% | 4.19% | -1.28% | -3.37% | -2.86% | 8.19% | 4.73% | 37.34% |
| 2022 | -6.75% | -1.97% | 4.42% | -8.98% | -1.68% | -8.83% | 7.90% | -2.35% | -8.45% | 2.93% | 4.16% | -4.81% | -23.35% |
| 2021 | 1.06% | 0.88% | 0.74% | 4.57% | 0.11% | 4.42% | 0.69% | 3.10% | -3.36% | 5.42% | 1.04% | 2.18% | 22.57% |
Benchmark Metrics
Test PAC 2 has an annualized alpha of 8.49%, beta of 0.55, and R² of 0.32 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since March 29, 2016.
- This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (95.12%) than losses (82.00%) — typical of diversified or defensive assets.
- Beta of 0.55 may look defensive, but with R² of 0.32 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index — low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
- R² of 0.32 means the benchmark explains less than half of this portfolio's behavior — treat beta with caution or consider switching to a more representative benchmark.
- Alpha
- 8.49%
- Beta
- 0.55
- R²
- 0.32
- Upside Capture
- 95.12%
- Downside Capture
- 82.00%
Expense Ratio
Test PAC 2 has an expense ratio of 0.25%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
Test PAC 2 ranks 68 for risk / return — better than 68% of portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.
Return / Risk — by metrics
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 0.88 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 1.37 | +0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.21 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 1.39 | +2.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.95 | 6.43 | +14.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 80 | 1.66 | 2.19 | 1.31 | 2.65 | 10.03 |
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 50 | 0.74 | 1.32 | 1.22 | 1.66 | 7.59 |
XDW0.L Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 88 | 1.79 | 2.22 | 1.34 | 6.51 | 19.52 |
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A | 84 | 1.86 | 2.34 | 1.33 | 2.83 | 10.96 |
Loading graphics...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading graphics...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Test PAC 2. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the Test PAC 2 was 30.35%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 71 trading sessions.
The current Test PAC 2 drawdown is 10.04%.
Depth | Start | To Bottom | Bottom | To Recover | End | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -30.35% | Feb 20, 2020 | 23 | Mar 23, 2020 | 71 | Jul 2, 2020 | 94 |
| -26.65% | Nov 23, 2021 | 230 | Oct 12, 2022 | 196 | Jul 19, 2023 | 426 |
| -19.42% | Feb 20, 2025 | 35 | Apr 9, 2025 | 39 | Jun 5, 2025 | 74 |
| -16.99% | Oct 2, 2018 | 60 | Dec 24, 2018 | 81 | Apr 23, 2019 | 141 |
| -10.49% | Jul 16, 2024 | 15 | Aug 5, 2024 | 48 | Oct 10, 2024 | 63 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.94, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.
Asset Correlations Table
| Benchmark | SGLP.L | XDW0.L | EIMI.L | CSNDX.MI | Portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.28 | 0.47 | 0.57 | 0.59 |
| SGLP.L | 0.06 | 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.15 |
| XDW0.L | 0.28 | 0.06 | 1.00 | 0.44 | 0.29 | 0.49 |
| EIMI.L | 0.47 | 0.16 | 0.44 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.75 |
| CSNDX.MI | 0.57 | 0.04 | 0.29 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.94 |
| Portfolio | 0.59 | 0.15 | 0.49 | 0.75 | 0.94 | 1.00 |