Holdings comparison

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Holdings comparison , comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.

As of Apr 2, 2026, the Holdings comparison returned -1.47% Year-To-Date and 37.58% of annualized return in the last 10 years.

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jul 19, 2012, Holdings comparison 's average daily return is +0.10%, while the average monthly return is +3.23%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 1.8 years.

Historically, 69% of months were positive and 31% were negative. The best month was Nov 2013 with a return of +74.1%, while the worst month was Dec 2013 at -17.7%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, Holdings comparison closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Nov 18, 2013 with a return of +14.1%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -13.2%.

Holdings comparison has an annualized alpha of 25.42%, beta of 1.00, and R² of 0.54 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since July 19, 2012.

• This portfolio captured 192.40% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 73.28% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
• This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 25.42% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
• With beta of 1.00 and R² of 0.54, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index — much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Holdings comparison has an expense ratio of 0.01%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.

Holdings comparison ranks 18 for risk / return — in the bottom 18% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Holdings comparison Sharpe ratios as of Apr 2, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

• 1-Year: 0.98
• 5-Year: 1.27
• 10-Year: 1.65
• All Time: 1.76

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.00 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Holdings comparison compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.

Holdings comparison provided a 1.18% dividend yield over the last twelve months.

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Holdings comparison . A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Holdings comparison was 32.73%, occurring on Mar 22, 2020. Recovery took 75 trading sessions.

The current Holdings comparison drawdown is 5.99%.

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.