PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


VGIT 60.00%IAU 10.00%VTI 30.00%BondBondCommodityCommodityEquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jul 14, 2026, the Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio returned 2.46% Year-To-Date and 6.50% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1M6MYTD1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
-0.79%1.13%7.92%9.79%19.89%18.60%11.43%13.27%
Portfolio
Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio
-0.66%-0.32%1.15%2.46%10.28%10.74%5.38%6.50%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
-2.60%-4.98%-13.00%-7.29%18.88%26.67%16.68%11.37%
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
-0.27%-0.40%-0.65%-0.68%2.56%3.46%-0.10%1.13%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
-0.78%1.22%8.45%10.96%21.85%19.76%12.01%14.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Nov 23, 2009, Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio's average daily return is +0.03%, while the average monthly return is +0.54%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 10.7 years.

Historically, 67% of months were positive and 33% were negative. The best month was Nov 2023 with a return of +4.9%, while the worst month was Sep 2022 at -5.1%. The longest winning streak lasted 11 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Nov 10, 2022 with a return of +3.0%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -2.9%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.67%1.80%-3.71%2.95%1.53%-1.20%-0.45%2.46%
20251.93%0.76%-0.40%1.10%1.35%2.33%0.37%2.13%2.39%1.36%1.10%0.09%15.46%
20240.36%0.73%2.16%-2.21%2.42%1.51%2.52%1.57%1.81%-1.23%2.13%-1.76%10.30%
20234.08%-2.73%3.44%0.85%-0.64%1.11%1.28%-0.81%-2.95%-0.57%4.89%3.31%11.46%
2022-2.93%-0.37%-0.88%-4.41%0.00%-2.92%3.68%-3.13%-5.11%1.80%3.94%-2.00%-12.09%
2021-0.69%-0.50%0.34%2.28%1.10%0.09%1.48%0.67%-2.27%1.71%-0.27%1.26%5.26%

Benchmark Metrics

Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio has an annualized alpha of 3.15%, beta of 0.27, and R2 of 0.61 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since November 23, 2009.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (33.43%) than losses (28.02%) - typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 3.15% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • Beta of 0.27 indicates this portfolio moves significantly less than S&P 500 Index - a genuinely defensive profile with reduced participation in both market rallies and downturns.

Alpha
3.15%
Beta
0.27
0.61
Upside Capture
33.43%
Downside Capture
28.02%

Expense Ratio

Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.05%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio ranks 36 for risk / return — below 36% of Portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

1.60

1.61

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

2.22

2.22

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.21

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.19

9.61

-1.42


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
22
0.681.021.150.721.77
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
24
0.761.151.130.912.31
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
66
1.712.361.312.4610.78

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk. Learn how to interpret the Sharpe ratio.

The current Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio Sharpe ratio is 1.60 as of Jul 14, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.32 to 2.10, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio provided a 2.65% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.65%2.61%2.58%2.07%1.54%1.38%1.77%1.87%1.84%1.52%1.59%1.61%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
3.89%3.79%3.67%2.73%1.74%1.69%2.23%2.24%2.05%1.67%1.69%1.69%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.05%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio was 16.15%, occurring on Oct 14, 2022. Recovery took 349 trading sessions.

The current Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio drawdown is 1.65%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Bear market2022
-16.15%Oct 2022
11mo 8d1y 4mo
2y 3moNov 2021 - Mar 2024
COVID crash2020
-8.85%Mar 2020
26d1mo 12d
2mo 8dFeb 2020 - Apr 2020
2026 pullback2026
-5.15%Mar 2026
25d1mo 10d
2mo 5dMar 2026 - May 2026
2025 selloff2025
-4.37%Apr 2025
1mo 17d20d
2mo 7dFeb 2025 - Apr 2025
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-4.26%Dec 2018
3mo 26d1mo 7d
5mo 3dAug 2018 - Jan 2019

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

AI Analysis


The gist

The portfolio is a plain-spoken 60/30/10 bet on a classic mix of rate duration, U.S. equities, and gold. The math says the sleeves do different jobs, though not so differently that the bond and gold pieces stop looking like cousins.

The numbers

  • The diversification ratio is 1.61 since inception, 85.8th percentile on the platform, which is solidly diversified by the platform’s standards.
  • The 1Y DR of 1.37 sits at the 57.1th percentile, weaker than the longer windows, so the sleeves have correlated somewhat more recently.
  • Effective asset count is 2.17 of 3, so the portfolio is spread across three labels, but not in the sense of three equal engines of risk.

The good

  • Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury (VGIT) and Vanguard Total Stock Market (VTI) have a -0.21 correlation, which is the cleanest source of ballast in the set.
  • iShares Gold Trust (IAU) is only modestly linked to both equities and bonds, so the portfolio has a real third sleeve rather than a decorative one.
  • The cluster data is clean: each position stands on its own, which is usually what diversification is trying to accomplish before it starts writing memos.

The bad

  • The portfolio is still dominated by VGIT at 60%, so the risk budget is not evenly shared.
  • IAU’s 0.3 correlation with VGIT means the bond-gold pairing is less “uncorrelated havens” and more “things investors reach for when macro gets uncomfortable,” which is not quite the same thing.
  • VTI’s 0.76 correlation to the portfolio means equities still drive most of the day-to-day movement.

The ugly

  • In a regime where rates rise and equity multiples compress at the same time, VGIT and VTI can fail to offset each other, and IAU may behave more like a mild cushion than a full counterweight.

Next steps

  • Portfolios with this structure are often viewed as a two-factor core, with VGIT doing most of the dampening and IAU providing a separate macro hedge.
  • The shorter-horizon DR suggests the correlations have tightened somewhat recently, so the portfolio’s diversification is present, but not inert.
  • Portfolios like this usually look best when the bond sleeve is understood as duration exposure first and diversification second.
AI-generated analysis. Not investment advice. Verify key facts independently.
Was this useful?

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 3 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.17, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.37

1.47

1.45

1.52

1.61

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.61, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio correlation to the S&P 500 Index

Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio has a 0.79 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009

0.75


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. VTI has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.99, while VGIT has the lowest at -0.21.

VGIT
-0.21
IAU
0.06
VTI
0.99

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio. VTI has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.76, while VGIT has the lowest at 0.33.

VGIT
0.33
IAU
0.48
VTI
0.76

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

IAUVGITVTI
IAU1.000.300.07
VGIT0.301.00-0.21
VTI0.07-0.211.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Nov 23, 2009
Diversification Analysis

Find what Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio is missing

See which holdings overlap, where Gyroscopic Investing Desert Portfolio is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification