Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | Consumer Cyclical | 17.40% |
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN | Leveraged Equities, Leveraged | 40% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN | Leveraged Equities, Leveraged | 10% |
FWONK Formula One Group | Communication Services | 4.30% |
GE General Electric Company | Industrials | 4% |
PDD Pinduoduo Inc. | Consumer Cyclical | 7.40% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | Large Cap Growth Equities | 16.90% |
Performance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in (no name), comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading graphics...
The earliest data available for this chart is Feb 20, 2025, corresponding to the inception date of FNGU
Returns By Period
| 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 2.51% | 0.02% | -0.92% | 0.71% | 24.30% | 18.22% | 10.44% | 12.72% |
Portfolio (no name) | 4.80% | -3.61% | -12.55% | -20.74% | 37.51% | — | — | — |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 2.69% | -1.44% | -6.24% | -6.00% | 39.27% | 23.33% | 11.53% | 16.67% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 4.68% | -5.52% | -14.50% | -30.81% | 28.25% | 8.70% | -9.99% | 5.47% |
PDD Pinduoduo Inc. | 4.23% | 1.08% | -8.50% | -22.44% | 10.40% | 12.93% | -5.49% | — |
FWONK Formula One Group | 1.92% | 4.43% | -10.51% | -17.41% | 11.12% | 6.45% | 14.54% | 9.08% |
GE General Electric Company | 6.74% | -4.31% | 0.16% | 2.08% | 82.85% | 61.21% | 36.00% | 8.91% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 7.30% | -10.19% | -26.72% | -38.83% | 95.05% | — | — | — |
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN | 5.18% | -5.47% | -15.78% | -23.51% | 77.12% | 59.73% | 18.11% | — |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Feb 21, 2025, (no name)'s average daily return is +0.05%, while the average monthly return is +0.68%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 8.5 years.
Historically, 53% of months were positive and 47% were negative. The best month was May 2025 with a return of +15.5%, while the worst month was Mar 2025 at -12.6%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.
On a daily basis, (no name) closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +18.4%, while the worst single day was Apr 4, 2025 at -10.4%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -2.53% | -9.18% | -8.87% | 8.40% | -12.55% | ||||||||
| 2025 | -9.35% | -12.55% | 3.38% | 15.51% | 13.05% | 3.49% | 2.85% | 13.95% | 4.60% | -5.50% | -7.07% | 19.22% |
Benchmark Metrics
Portfolio has an annualized alpha of -9.38%, beta of 1.97, and R² of 0.83 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since February 21, 2025.
- This portfolio captured 232.14% of S&P 500 Index gains and 225.55% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
- This portfolio had an annualized alpha of -9.38% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering less than market exposure alone would predict.
- Beta of 1.97 means this portfolio moves significantly more than S&P 500 Index — expect amplified gains in rallies and amplified losses in downturns.
- Alpha
- -9.38%
- Beta
- 1.97
- R²
- 0.83
- Upside Capture
- 232.14%
- Downside Capture
- 225.55%
Expense Ratio
(no name) has an expense ratio of 0.48%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
(no name) ranks 17 for risk / return — in the bottom 17% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.
Return / Risk — by metrics
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 2.19 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | 3.49 | -0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.48 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 3.70 | -2.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.59 | 16.45 | -11.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 53 | 1.87 | 2.93 | 1.39 | 2.26 | 8.03 |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 48 | 0.65 | 1.30 | 1.14 | 0.25 | 0.60 |
PDD Pinduoduo Inc. | 37 | 0.31 | 0.63 | 1.09 | -0.01 | -0.03 |
FWONK Formula One Group | 43 | 0.47 | 0.83 | 1.09 | 0.38 | 0.83 |
GE General Electric Company | 89 | 2.71 | 3.37 | 1.45 | 4.11 | 15.42 |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 32 | 1.31 | 2.19 | 1.28 | 1.59 | 4.14 |
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN | 38 | 1.51 | 2.41 | 1.30 | 1.86 | 5.13 |
Loading graphics...
Dividends
Dividend yield
(no name) provided a 0.37% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 0.37% | 0.33% | 0.45% | 0.33% | 0.13% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 0.39% | 0.35% | 0.34% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.44% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 1.60% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDD Pinduoduo Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FWONK Formula One Group | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GE General Electric Company | 0.50% | 0.47% | 0.67% | 0.25% | 0.38% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 4.12% | 4.89% | 4.81% | 2.94% | 2.95% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading graphics...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the (no name). A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the (no name) was 35.97%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. Recovery took 52 trading sessions.
The current (no name) drawdown is 25.21%.
Depth | Start | To Bottom | Bottom | To Recover | End | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -35.97% | Feb 21, 2025 | 33 | Apr 8, 2025 | 52 | Jun 24, 2025 | 85 |
| -35.33% | Oct 30, 2025 | 103 | Mar 30, 2026 | — | — | — |
| -6.9% | Oct 9, 2025 | 2 | Oct 10, 2025 | 11 | Oct 27, 2025 | 13 |
| -4.66% | Aug 14, 2025 | 6 | Aug 21, 2025 | 5 | Aug 28, 2025 | 11 |
| -4.38% | Jul 29, 2025 | 4 | Aug 1, 2025 | 7 | Aug 12, 2025 | 11 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 7 assets, with an effective number of assets of 4.21, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.
Asset Correlations Table
| Benchmark | FWONK | BABA | PDD | GE | FNGO | FNGU | VUG | Portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | 1.00 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.94 | 0.83 |
| FWONK | 0.31 | 1.00 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.31 |
| BABA | 0.35 | 0.20 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.16 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.52 |
| PDD | 0.45 | 0.20 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.44 | 0.55 |
| GE | 0.57 | 0.22 | 0.16 | 0.27 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.52 |
| FNGO | 0.79 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.37 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.90 | 0.93 |
| FNGU | 0.80 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 0.51 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.93 |
| VUG | 0.94 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 0.55 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.91 |
| Portfolio | 0.83 | 0.31 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 1.00 |