Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | Leveraged Equities, Leveraged | -50% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | Leveraged Equities, Leveraged | 150% |
Performance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in test, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading graphics...
The earliest data available for this chart is Feb 11, 2010, corresponding to the inception date of TQQQ
Returns By Period
As of Apr 3, 2026, the test returned -48.97% Year-To-Date and 17.43% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.11% | -3.43% | -3.84% | -1.98% | 16.08% | 16.86% | 10.37% | 12.29% |
Portfolio test | 0.38% | -38.56% | -48.97% | -48.36% | 42.23% | 63.77% | — | 17.43% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.23% | -9.77% | -17.68% | -18.09% | 45.61% | 47.33% | 13.60% | 35.51% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -0.21% | 6.93% | 13.75% | 7.42% | -55.21% | -49.54% | -42.72% | -52.78% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Feb 12, 2010, test's average daily return is -0.46%, while the average monthly return is +6.26%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 1.0 years.
Historically, 63% of months were positive and 37% were negative. The best month was Mar 2022 with a return of +108.8%, while the worst month was Jun 2022 at -385.5%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.
On a daily basis, test closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 13, 2020 with a return of +649.7%, while the worst single day was Mar 11, 2022 at -864.2%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 5.51% | -15.84% | -46.26% | 6.93% | -48.97% | ||||||||
| 2025 | 10.66% | -17.46% | -51.41% | 3.18% | 47.68% | 27.79% | 12.02% | 2.83% | 27.42% | 25.83% | -10.08% | -5.92% | 35.05% |
| 2024 | 8.42% | 27.76% | 3.74% | -28.82% | 46.98% | 33.46% | -13.43% | 3.65% | 14.21% | -7.63% | 30.96% | -1.15% | 145.88% |
| 2023 | 62.33% | -4.04% | 45.49% | 0.54% | 41.43% | 30.29% | 19.75% | -9.95% | -28.45% | -15.00% | 71.07% | 23.09% | 479.87% |
| 2022 | -53.06% | -49.55% | 108.75% | -84.26% | -41.15% | -385.49% | 78.92% | -23.12% | -49.83% | 22.47% | 25.80% | -40.93% | -108.21% |
| 2021 | 0.81% | -1.30% | 8.22% | 33.27% | -6.44% | 29.96% | 17.03% | 22.43% | -26.56% | 48.26% | 8.78% | 2.22% | 202.71% |
Benchmark Metrics
test has an annualized alpha of -85.23%, beta of 5.79, and R² of 0.03 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since February 12, 2010.
- This portfolio captured 1824.85% of S&P 500 Index gains and 279.71% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
- R² of 0.03 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index — capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.
- Alpha
- -85.23%
- Beta
- 5.79
- R²
- 0.03
- Upside Capture
- 1,824.85%
- Downside Capture
- 279.71%
Expense Ratio
test has a high expense ratio of 0.95%, indicating above-average management fees. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
test ranks 33 for risk / return — below 33% of portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.
Return / Risk — by metrics
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.19 | 0.88 | -0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.06 | 1.37 | +0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.21 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | 1.39 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.33 | 6.43 | -4.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 41 | 0.68 | 1.36 | 1.19 | 1.32 | 3.99 |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 2 | -0.82 | -1.10 | 0.85 | -0.75 | -0.86 |
Loading graphics...
Dividends
Dividend yield
test provided a -1.91% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | -1.91% | -3.71% | -3.21% | -2.11% | 0.71% | 0.00% | -1.07% | -1.37% | -0.57% | -0.07% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.73% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 6.00% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading graphics...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the test. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the test was 150.67%, occurring on Nov 19, 2021. The portfolio has not yet recovered.
The current test drawdown is 62.64%.
Depth | Start | To Bottom | Bottom | To Recover | End | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -150.67% | Aug 30, 2018 | 813 | Nov 19, 2021 | — | — | — |
| -90.33% | Jul 21, 2015 | 141 | Feb 9, 2016 | 219 | Dec 20, 2016 | 360 |
| -73.67% | Jul 27, 2011 | 18 | Aug 19, 2011 | 113 | Feb 1, 2012 | 131 |
| -71.1% | Apr 26, 2010 | 49 | Jul 2, 2010 | 118 | Dec 20, 2010 | 167 |
| -66.23% | Apr 3, 2012 | 157 | Nov 15, 2012 | 121 | May 13, 2013 | 278 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 0.40, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.
Asset Correlations Table
| Benchmark | SQQQ | TQQQ | Portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | 1.00 | -0.90 | 0.90 | 0.85 |
| SQQQ | -0.90 | 1.00 | -1.00 | -0.95 |
| TQQQ | 0.90 | -1.00 | 1.00 | 0.95 |
| Portfolio | 0.85 | -0.95 | 0.95 | 1.00 |