Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | Nasdaq-100 | 70% |
AAPL Apple Inc | Technology | 30% |
Find the right asset allocation for 1
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 1, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of Jun 13, 2026, the 1 returned 14.48% Year-To-Date and 24.44% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| Position | 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.50% | -0.17% | 8.56% | 8.85% | 22.93% | 19.37% | 11.84% | 13.61% |
Portfolio 1 | -0.01% | -0.09% | 14.48% | 13.84% | 39.58% | 24.25% | 17.83% | 24.44% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
AAPL Apple Inc | -1.52% | -2.59% | 7.29% | 4.81% | 46.73% | 17.21% | 18.59% | 29.36% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.59% | 0.93% | 17.57% | 17.85% | 35.82% | 26.43% | 16.85% | 21.79% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Mar 10, 1999, 1's average daily return is +0.08%, while the average monthly return is +1.63%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 3.6 years.
Historically, 62% of months were positive and 38% were negative. The best month was Jan 2001 with a return of +21.1%, while the worst month was Sep 2000 at -26.6%. The longest winning streak lasted 8 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 6 months.
On a daily basis, 1 closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Jan 3, 2001 with a return of +14.6%, while the worst single day was Sep 29, 2000 at -17.7%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.51% | -1.12% | -4.57% | 13.07% | 11.85% | -3.58% | 14.48% | ||||||
| 2025 | -0.22% | -1.20% | -7.73% | -0.35% | 4.94% | 5.34% | 2.04% | 4.26% | 6.77% | 5.20% | -0.11% | -1.25% | 18.12% |
| 2024 | 0.01% | 3.23% | -0.51% | -3.27% | 8.26% | 7.49% | 0.44% | 1.77% | 2.32% | -1.53% | 5.30% | 1.97% | 27.86% |
| 2023 | 10.77% | 0.45% | 10.22% | 1.22% | 6.88% | 7.23% | 3.08% | -2.30% | -6.18% | -1.52% | 10.99% | 4.30% | 53.26% |
| 2022 | -6.59% | -4.77% | 5.02% | -12.44% | -2.78% | -8.68% | 14.44% | -4.51% | -11.01% | 6.07% | 2.79% | -9.95% | -30.66% |
| 2021 | 0.02% | -2.45% | 1.45% | 6.42% | -2.37% | 7.34% | 3.96% | 4.23% | -6.03% | 7.27% | 4.51% | 3.10% | 29.91% |
Benchmark Metrics
1 has an annualized alpha of 11.04%, beta of 1.18, and R2 of 0.65 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since March 10, 1999.
- This portfolio captured 173.88% of S&P 500 Index gains and 114.36% of its losses - amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
- This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 11.04% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
- Alpha
- 11.04%
- Beta
- 1.18
- R²
- 0.65
- Upside Capture
- 173.88%
- Downside Capture
- 114.36%
Expense Ratio
1 has an expense ratio of 0.13%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
1 ranks 75 for risk / return — better than 75% of Portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.
Return / Risk — by metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.44 | 1.86 | +0.58 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.27 | 2.53 | +0.73 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.34 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 2.53 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.33 | 11.37 | +1.95 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
1 provided a 0.38% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 0.38% | 0.43% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 0.44% | 0.57% | 0.83% | 1.17% | 1.02% | 1.32% | 1.27% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 1. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the 1 was 79.10%, occurring on Oct 9, 2002. Recovery took 1167 trading sessions.
The current 1 drawdown is 4.58%.
Related event | Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Dot-com crash2000–2002 | -79.10%Oct 2002 | 2y 6mo | 4y 7mo | 7y 2moMar 2000 - May 2007 |
Financial crisis2007–2009 | -53.84%Nov 2008 | 1y 20d | 1y 4mo | 2y 4moNov 2007 - Mar 2010 |
Bear market2022 | -33.38%Dec 2022 | 1y | 6mo 22d | 1y 6moDec 2021 - Jul 2023 |
COVID crash2020 | -28.74%Mar 2020 | 1mo 2d | 2mo 12d | 3mo 14dFeb 2020 - Jun 2020 |
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018 | -26.87%Dec 2018 | 2mo 21d | 4mo 10d | 7mo 1dOct 2018 - May 2019 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.72, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 1.16 | 1.10 | 1.06 | 1.05 | 1.10 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.10, placing it in the bottom quartile across portfolios — positions are highly correlated. Consider adding assets from different classes or sectors to reduce risk.
1 correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999 | 0.80 |
Asset Correlations Table
Find what 1 is missing
See which holdings overlap, where 1 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification