PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
(no name)
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


SPGI 38.99%NEE 29.99%LLY 16.79%AMZN 10.47%1 position 3.76%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in (no name), comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Jan 10, 2003, corresponding to the inception date of NEE

Returns By Period

As of Apr 3, 2026, the (no name) returned -4.76% Year-To-Date and 23.23% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
(no name)
0.29%-1.74%-4.76%5.55%10.90%20.78%15.26%23.23%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.93%-1.47%-4.88%-6.08%60.69%85.17%66.71%70.07%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
-0.38%0.50%-9.12%-5.68%7.02%27.00%5.83%21.61%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
-1.98%-7.16%-12.80%14.47%15.19%39.72%39.64%31.19%
SPGI
S&P Global Inc.
1.41%-2.89%-17.30%-9.15%-15.45%8.46%4.39%17.03%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
0.32%0.60%16.82%20.77%36.09%9.87%6.95%15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jan 13, 2003, (no name)'s average daily return is +0.08%, while the average monthly return is +1.55%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 3.8 years.

Historically, 68% of months were positive and 32% were negative. The best month was Apr 2009 with a return of +15.5%, while the worst month was Sep 2008 at -17.6%. The longest winning streak lasted 20 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, (no name) closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 13, 2008 with a return of +17.5%, while the worst single day was Oct 15, 2008 at -11.7%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20263.13%-5.06%-3.74%1.05%-4.76%
20253.11%1.99%-5.05%-1.13%1.43%3.25%2.80%0.07%-2.56%6.15%6.64%-0.39%16.85%
20242.61%2.78%5.62%0.14%9.18%0.93%3.29%6.87%0.96%-5.33%4.20%-4.30%29.31%
20234.08%-6.31%6.54%4.62%4.03%7.02%-0.83%1.47%-8.26%-0.40%10.35%3.91%27.58%
2022-13.17%-2.82%9.61%-11.40%0.47%-1.56%11.13%-4.80%-8.43%3.14%7.85%-4.36%-16.48%
20213.77%-1.49%1.75%6.25%-1.60%7.69%4.21%6.02%-6.27%10.01%0.35%4.46%39.84%

Benchmark Metrics

Portfolio has an annualized alpha of 10.48%, beta of 0.93, and R² of 0.70 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since January 13, 2003.

  • This portfolio captured 118.86% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 71.71% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 10.48% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • With beta of 0.93 and R² of 0.70, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index — much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
10.48%
Beta
0.93
0.70
Upside Capture
118.86%
Downside Capture
71.71%

Expense Ratio

(no name) has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

(no name) ranks 12 for risk / return — in the bottom 12% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


(no name) Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
(no name) Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
(no name) Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
(no name) Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
(no name) Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
(no name) Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.55

0.88

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.85

1.37

-0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.21

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

1.39

-0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.70

6.43

-3.74


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
811.472.171.273.027.54
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
460.200.551.070.421.00
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
510.360.781.110.561.37
SPGI
S&P Global Inc.
18-0.53-0.520.92-0.49-1.22
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
791.411.881.263.177.01

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

(no name) Sharpe ratios as of Apr 3, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.55
  • 5-Year: 0.80
  • 10-Year: 1.19
  • All Time: 0.91

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.98 to 1.66, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of (no name) compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

(no name) provided a 1.21% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio1.21%1.23%1.26%1.37%1.18%0.96%1.16%1.28%1.57%1.56%1.88%1.85%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.67%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%
SPGI
S&P Global Inc.
0.89%0.73%0.73%0.82%0.99%0.65%0.82%0.84%1.18%0.97%1.34%1.34%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
2.49%2.82%2.87%3.08%2.03%1.65%1.81%2.06%2.55%2.52%2.91%2.96%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the (no name). A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the (no name) was 54.69%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 619 trading sessions.

The current (no name) drawdown is 7.89%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-54.69%Jun 5, 2007372Nov 20, 2008619May 9, 2011991
-30.13%Feb 20, 202023Mar 23, 202039May 18, 202062
-26.13%Dec 16, 2021209Oct 14, 2022177Jun 30, 2023386
-18.18%Oct 17, 2024118Apr 8, 202594Aug 22, 2025212
-15.65%Sep 17, 201869Dec 24, 201840Feb 22, 2019109

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 5 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.54, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkNEELLYNVDAAMZNSPGIPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.430.480.590.600.630.76
NEE0.431.000.300.170.220.310.62
LLY0.480.301.000.250.280.350.58
NVDA0.590.170.251.000.460.370.48
AMZN0.600.220.280.461.000.400.58
SPGI0.630.310.350.370.401.000.82
Portfolio0.760.620.580.480.580.821.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jan 13, 2003