PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
test
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


QQQ 50.00%NVDA 50.00%EquityEquity
PositionCategory/SectorTarget Weight
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
Technology
50%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
Large Cap Growth Equities
50%

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in test, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Mar 10, 1999, corresponding to the inception date of QQQ

Returns By Period

As of Apr 3, 2026, the test returned -4.75% Year-To-Date and 45.83% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
test
0.53%-2.04%-4.75%-4.63%41.67%53.84%40.90%45.83%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.11%-2.64%-4.65%-3.18%23.45%22.97%13.18%19.05%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.93%-1.47%-4.88%-6.08%60.69%85.17%66.71%70.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Mar 11, 1999, test's average daily return is +0.13%, while the average monthly return is +2.60%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 2.3 years.

Historically, 59% of months were positive and 41% were negative. The best month was May 2003 with a return of +46.1%, while the worst month was Jun 2002 at -29.6%. The longest winning streak lasted 8 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 9 months.

On a daily basis, test closed higher 53% of trading days. The best single day was Jan 3, 2001 with a return of +23.6%, while the worst single day was Mar 14, 2000 at -20.1%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.86%-4.84%-3.22%1.53%-4.75%
2025-4.16%0.42%-10.33%0.95%16.54%11.97%7.49%-0.63%6.24%6.68%-7.23%2.26%30.55%
202413.05%18.11%8.99%-4.37%16.53%9.85%-3.48%1.55%2.19%4.22%4.71%-1.25%92.32%
202322.17%10.15%15.53%0.20%22.05%9.23%7.20%2.21%-8.74%-4.17%12.72%5.74%137.23%
2022-12.75%-2.54%8.20%-22.80%-0.59%-13.40%16.16%-11.16%-14.81%7.61%15.86%-11.62%-40.76%
2021-0.12%2.70%-0.49%9.21%3.70%15.43%0.17%9.38%-6.59%15.69%15.85%-5.44%73.10%

Benchmark Metrics

test has an annualized alpha of 22.84%, beta of 1.41, and R² of 0.46 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since March 11, 1999.

  • This portfolio captured 261.98% of S&P 500 Index gains and 132.24% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • R² of 0.46 means the benchmark explains less than half of this portfolio's behavior — treat beta with caution or consider switching to a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
22.84%
Beta
1.41
0.46
Upside Capture
261.98%
Downside Capture
132.24%

Expense Ratio

test has an expense ratio of 0.09%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

test ranks 58 for risk / return — on par with similar portfolios. You're getting a typical balance of risk and reward. Not a standout, but not a red flag either — a reasonable choice if other factors align with your goals.


test Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
test Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
test Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
test Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
test Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
test Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

0.88

+0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.03

1.37

+0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.21

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

1.39

+1.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.47

6.43

+1.04


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
591.041.621.231.937.00
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
811.472.171.273.027.54

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

test Sharpe ratios as of Apr 3, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.36
  • 5-Year: 1.15
  • 10-Year: 1.34
  • All Time: 0.67

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.98 to 1.66, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of test compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

test provided a 0.25% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.25%0.24%0.29%0.33%0.46%0.24%0.34%0.51%0.68%0.57%0.76%1.09%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.48%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the test. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the test was 75.53%, occurring on Oct 9, 2002. Recovery took 851 trading sessions.

The current test drawdown is 11.13%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-75.53%Jun 22, 2000576Oct 9, 2002851Feb 27, 20061427
-72.02%Oct 24, 2007273Nov 20, 20081319Feb 20, 20141592
-52.59%Nov 30, 2021221Oct 14, 2022153May 25, 2023374
-47.62%Mar 14, 200024Apr 14, 200046Jun 21, 200070
-40.01%Oct 2, 201858Dec 24, 2018249Dec 19, 2019307

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkNVDAQQQPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.560.870.69
NVDA0.561.000.650.97
QQQ0.870.651.000.80
Portfolio0.690.970.801.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Mar 11, 1999