PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZVU.TO vs. ZEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZVU.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI USA Value ETF (ZVU.TO) and BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZVU.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZVU.TO
BMO MSCI USA Value ETF
5.61%20.00%15.86%11.00%-5.51%
ZEQT.TO
BMO All-Equity ETF
1.00%19.67%25.44%16.79%-5.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZVU.TO achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly higher than ZEQT.TO's 1.00% return.


ZVU.TO

1D
0.35%
1M
-3.13%
YTD
5.61%
6M
7.71%
1Y
24.55%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*

ZEQT.TO

1D
0.59%
1M
-3.85%
YTD
1.00%
6M
2.22%
1Y
21.48%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZVU.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZVU.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ZVU.TO vs. ZEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZVU.TO
ZVU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ZVU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ZEQT.TO
ZEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ZEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZVU.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI USA Value ETF (ZVU.TO) and BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZVU.TOZEQT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

1.32

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

1.84

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

1.79

+0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.44

7.62

-0.19

ZVU.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZVU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the ZEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZVU.TO and ZEQT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZVU.TOZEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.32

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.02

-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between ZVU.TO and ZEQT.TO is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ZVU.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZVU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than ZEQT.TO's 1.44% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ZVU.TO
BMO MSCI USA Value ETF
1.50%1.62%2.13%2.55%2.45%1.89%2.38%1.97%1.98%
ZEQT.TO
BMO All-Equity ETF
1.44%1.45%1.69%2.13%2.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ZVU.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZVU.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, which is greater than ZEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZVU.TO and ZEQT.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZVU.TOZEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.24%

-16.87%

-17.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-11.90%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.66%

-5.31%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-3.09%

-3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

2.80%

+0.68%

Volatility

ZVU.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO MSCI USA Value ETF (ZVU.TO) is 5.18%, while BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that ZVU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZVU.TOZEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

5.48%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

10.03%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.17%

16.40%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

13.78%

+1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.76%

13.78%

+3.98%