ZVC.TO vs. XDU.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO) and iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO).

ZVC.TO and XDU.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZVC.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the MSCI Canada Enhanced Value Capped Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2017. XDU.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. It was launched on Jun 7, 2017. Both ZVC.TO and XDU.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ZVC.TO vs. XDU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO) and iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZVC.TO vs. XDU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ZVC.TO BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF	6.52%	30.30%	15.38%	11.07%	2.23%	31.46%	-3.94%	10.02%	-5.80%
XDU.TO iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF	6.38%	2.42%	14.09%	3.53%	1.36%	20.68%	-1.03%	15.73%	3.54%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZVC.TO having a 6.52% return and XDU.TO slightly lower at 6.38%.

ZVC.TO

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -1.75%
• YTD: 6.52%
• 6M: 14.78%
• 1Y: 38.00%
• 3Y*: 19.87%
• 5Y*: 16.40%
• 10Y*: —

XDU.TO

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: -3.38%
• YTD: 6.38%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 5.40%
• 3Y*: 9.15%
• 5Y*: 8.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZVC.TO vs. XDU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZVC.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XDU.TO's 0.16% expense ratio.

ZVC.TO

BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF

XDU.TO

iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF

Return for Risk

ZVC.TO vs. XDU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZVC.TO

ZVC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 95
ZVC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ZVC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ZVC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ZVC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ZVC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

XDU.TO

XDU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 21
XDU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
XDU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
XDU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 21
XDU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
XDU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZVC.TO vs. XDU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO) and iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZVC.TO	XDU.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.74	0.37	+2.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	0.58	+2.93
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.08	+0.50
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	0.38	+3.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.20	1.10	+17.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZVC.TO vs. XDU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZVC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the XDU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZVC.TO and XDU.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZVC.TO	XDU.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.74	0.37	+2.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.22	0.68	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.53	+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between ZVC.TO and XDU.TO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ZVC.TO vs. XDU.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZVC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than XDU.TO's 2.34% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZVC.TO BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF	2.13%	2.23%	2.87%	3.32%	2.96%	2.41%	3.30%	2.66%	2.67%	0.00%
XDU.TO iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF	2.34%	2.46%	2.12%	2.31%	2.05%	2.06%	2.72%	2.31%	2.27%	1.27%

Drawdowns

ZVC.TO vs. XDU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZVC.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.00%, which is greater than XDU.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZVC.TO and XDU.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZVC.TO	XDU.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.00%	-26.12%	-14.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.03%	-11.38%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.17%	-16.69%	+0.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.92%	-3.38%	+1.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.02%	-3.90%	-1.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	3.94%	-1.85%

Volatility

ZVC.TO vs. XDU.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO) at 3.44%. This indicates that ZVC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZVC.TO	XDU.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.09%	3.44%	+0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.43%	8.79%	-0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.91%	14.63%	-0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.54%	12.10%	+1.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.42%	14.99%	+2.43%