PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZUT.TO vs. VCN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

ZUT.TO vs. VCN.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (VCN.TO).

ZUT.TO and VCN.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZUT.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Index. It was launched on Jan 19, 2010. VCN.TO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Canada All Cap Domestic Index. It was launched on Aug 2, 2013. Both ZUT.TO and VCN.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ZUT.TO vs. VCN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (VCN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZUT.TO vs. VCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZUT.TO
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF		16.20%15.25%14.13%-5.37%-8.69%5.45%28.15%35.59%-8.02%8.46%
VCN.TO
Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF		4.21%30.20%22.14%12.26%-5.78%25.63%4.81%22.06%-9.11%8.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZUT.TO achieves a 16.20% return, which is significantly higher than VCN.TO's 4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, ZUT.TO has underperformed VCN.TO with an annualized return of 10.46%, while VCN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.47% annualized return.

ZUT.TO

1D
0.48%
1M
3.92%
YTD
16.20%
6M
13.42%
1Y
28.59%
3Y*
11.64%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
10.46%

VCN.TO

1D
0.57%
1M
-4.18%
YTD
4.21%
6M
9.50%
1Y
32.77%
3Y*
21.11%
5Y*
14.84%
10Y*
12.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF

Often compared with ZUT.TO:
ZUT.TO vs. XUT.TOZUT.TO vs. ZWU.TOZUT.TO vs. ZLB.TOZUT.TO vs. VDY.TOZUT.TO vs. XMA.TOZUT.TO vs. XDIV.TOZUT.TO vs. ZWC.TO
Often compared with VCN.TO:
VCN.TO vs. VDY.TOVCN.TO vs. VFV.TOVCN.TO vs. VCE.TOVCN.TO vs. XEQT.TOVCN.TO vs. VIU.TOVCN.TO vs. VUN.TOVCN.TO vs. HXT.TO

ZUT.TO vs. VCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZUT.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VCN.TO's 0.05% expense ratio.

ZUT.TO
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF
VCN.TO
Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF

Return for Risk

ZUT.TO vs. VCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZUT.TO
ZUT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ZUT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZUT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZUT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ZUT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZUT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
VCN.TO
VCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZUT.TO vs. VCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (VCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ZUT.TOVCN.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.43

2.16

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.13

2.75

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.43

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

3.04

+0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.20

13.74

-5.55

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZUT.TO vs. VCN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZUT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the VCN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZUT.TO and VCN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ZUT.TOVCN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.16

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

1.15

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.84

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.75

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between ZUT.TO and VCN.TO is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ZUT.TO vs. VCN.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZUT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than VCN.TO's 2.12% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZUT.TO
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF		2.91%3.44%3.98%4.35%3.95%3.25%3.31%4.00%4.59%3.71%3.98%4.63%
VCN.TO
Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF		2.12%2.27%2.69%2.99%3.15%2.48%2.70%2.85%2.80%2.29%2.34%2.65%

Drawdowns

ZUT.TO vs. VCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZUT.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, roughly equal to the maximum VCN.TO drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZUT.TO and VCN.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

ZUT.TOVCN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.08%

-37.32%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-11.02%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.42%

-16.12%

-16.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.08%

-37.32%

+0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.18%

+4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-3.94%

-2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

2.43%

+1.13%

Volatility

ZUT.TO vs. VCN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT.TO) is 4.72%, while Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (VCN.TO) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that ZUT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

ZUT.TOVCN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

5.64%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.48%

10.77%

-2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

15.25%

-3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

12.95%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.48%

14.95%

+1.53%