PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZUAG.TO vs. XEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZUAG.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZUAG.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZUAG.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZUAG.TO
BMO US Aggregate Bond Index ETF
1.54%-0.80%9.45%110.96%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
1.51%19.47%24.36%11.12%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZUAG.TO having a 1.54% return and XEQT.TO slightly lower at 1.51%.


ZUAG.TO

1D
0.31%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.54%
6M
-1.97%
1Y
-1.88%
3Y*
3.49%
5Y*
10Y*

XEQT.TO

1D
0.85%
1M
-3.50%
YTD
1.51%
6M
2.89%
1Y
21.17%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZUAG.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZUAG.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ZUAG.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZUAG.TO
ZUAG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ZUAG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZUAG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZUAG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ZUAG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZUAG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

XEQT.TO
XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZUAG.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZUAG.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZUAG.TOXEQT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.23

1.33

-1.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.25

1.85

-2.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.29

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

1.79

-1.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.35

7.98

-8.33

ZUAG.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZUAG.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZUAG.TO and XEQT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZUAG.TOXEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

1.33

-1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.86

-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between ZUAG.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ZUAG.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZUAG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than XEQT.TO's 1.64% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
ZUAG.TO
BMO US Aggregate Bond Index ETF
2.59%2.51%2.09%1.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
1.64%1.66%2.01%2.07%2.12%1.64%1.66%1.19%

Drawdowns

ZUAG.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZUAG.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.19%, smaller than the maximum XEQT.TO drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZUAG.TO and XEQT.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZUAG.TOXEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.19%

-29.74%

+22.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.92%

-11.78%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.71%

-4.27%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-4.20%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

2.64%

+1.35%

Volatility

ZUAG.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZUAG.TO) is 1.99%, while iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that ZUAG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZUAG.TOXEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

5.77%

-3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.74%

9.49%

-3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.09%

15.99%

-7.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.00%

13.03%

+47.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.00%

15.63%

+45.37%