ZTL.NEO vs. ZNQ.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF (ZTL.NEO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO).

ZTL.NEO and ZNQ.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZTL.NEO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index. It was launched on Feb 28, 2017. ZNQ.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Feb 11, 2019. Both ZTL.NEO and ZNQ.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ZTL.NEO vs. ZNQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF (ZTL.NEO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZTL.NEO vs. ZNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ZTL.NEO BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF	1.22%	-0.43%	-0.21%	0.46%	-26.25%	-5.72%	14.95%	11.57%
ZNQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF	-3.70%	14.60%	35.84%	51.32%	-28.06%	26.59%	44.65%	22.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTL.NEO achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly higher than ZNQ.TO's -3.70% return.

ZTL.NEO

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -1.74%
• YTD: 1.22%
• 6M: -1.42%
• 1Y: -4.26%
• 3Y*: -1.89%
• 5Y*: -4.01%
• 10Y*: —

ZNQ.TO

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: -2.40%
• YTD: -3.70%
• 6M: -3.73%
• 1Y: 19.86%
• 3Y*: 23.52%
• 5Y*: 15.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTL.NEO vs. ZNQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTL.NEO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than ZNQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.

ZNQ.TO

BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF

ZTL.NEO

BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF

Return for Risk

ZTL.NEO vs. ZNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTL.NEO

ZTL.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 6
ZTL.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
ZTL.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ZTL.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
ZTL.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
ZTL.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7

ZNQ.TO

ZNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 50
ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ZNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
ZNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 50
ZNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ZNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTL.NEO vs. ZNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF (ZTL.NEO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZTL.NEO	ZNQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.36	0.88	-1.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.41	1.35	-1.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.20	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	1.56	-1.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.57	4.56	-5.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZTL.NEO vs. ZNQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTL.NEO Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTL.NEO and ZNQ.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZTL.NEO	ZNQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.36	0.88	-1.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.25	0.73	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	0.90	-0.92

Correlation

The correlation between ZTL.NEO and ZNQ.TO is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

ZTL.NEO vs. ZNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZTL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than ZNQ.TO's 0.26% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZTL.NEO BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF	3.16%	3.15%	3.07%	3.55%	3.44%	2.46%	2.26%	2.55%	2.75%	2.82%
ZNQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF	0.26%	0.25%	0.30%	0.35%	0.23%	0.12%	0.47%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ZTL.NEO vs. ZNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -49.55%, which is greater than ZNQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -32.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTL.NEO and ZNQ.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZTL.NEO	ZNQ.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.55%	-32.09%	-17.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.95%	-13.03%	+1.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.89%	-32.09%	-7.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.87%	-8.73%	-32.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.41%	-6.76%	-16.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.75%	4.45%	+2.30%

Volatility

ZTL.NEO vs. ZNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF (ZTL.NEO) is 3.24%, while BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) has a volatility of 6.38%. This indicates that ZTL.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZNQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZTL.NEO	ZNQ.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.24%	6.38%	-3.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.83%	12.68%	-5.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.99%	22.59%	-10.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.36%	20.84%	-4.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.93%	22.46%	-6.53%