PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSDB.TO vs. ZNQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZSDB.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF (ZSDB.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZSDB.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZSDB.TO
BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF
0.01%2.56%6.02%5.94%-2.83%
ZNQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF
-4.69%14.60%35.84%51.32%-16.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSDB.TO achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly higher than ZNQ.TO's -4.69% return.


ZSDB.TO

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
0.01%
6M
-0.73%
1Y
0.96%
3Y*
4.44%
5Y*
10Y*

ZNQ.TO

1D
3.23%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
-4.69%
6M
-4.08%
1Y
19.05%
3Y*
23.10%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZSDB.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSDB.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ZNQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ZSDB.TO vs. ZNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSDB.TO
ZSDB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
ZSDB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSDB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSDB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSDB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSDB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

ZNQ.TO
ZNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSDB.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF (ZSDB.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZSDB.TOZNQ.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.42

0.85

-0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.50

1.30

-0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.19

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

1.49

-0.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.60

4.40

-2.81

ZSDB.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSDB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSDB.TO and ZNQ.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZSDB.TOZNQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

0.85

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.89

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between ZSDB.TO and ZNQ.TO is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ZSDB.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZSDB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than ZNQ.TO's 0.26% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
ZSDB.TO
BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF
1.31%1.28%1.33%1.75%1.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZNQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF
0.26%0.25%0.30%0.35%0.23%0.12%0.47%0.52%

Drawdowns

ZSDB.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSDB.TO drawdown since its inception was -4.88%, smaller than the maximum ZNQ.TO drawdown of -32.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSDB.TO and ZNQ.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSDB.TOZNQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-32.09%

+27.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.93%

-13.03%

+11.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-9.67%

+8.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-6.76%

+5.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

4.42%

-3.76%

Volatility

ZSDB.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF (ZSDB.TO) is 0.92%, while BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that ZSDB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZNQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZSDB.TOZNQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

6.36%

-5.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.98%

12.64%

-10.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31%

22.57%

-20.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.66%

20.84%

-17.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.66%

22.46%

-18.80%