ZPR5.DE vs. EMA5.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (ZPR5.DE) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE).

ZPR5.DE and EMA5.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZPR5.DE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA Emerging Markets USD Government Bond 0-5 ex-144a. It was launched on Nov 12, 2014. EMA5.DE is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the J.P. Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified Short-Term Custom Maturity. It was launched on Dec 3, 2020. Both ZPR5.DE and EMA5.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ZPR5.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (ZPR5.DE) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZPR5.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ZPR5.DE SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF	1.21%	-4.12%	11.04%	2.52%	-1.06%	7.98%	-1.18%
EMA5.DE L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF	0.75%	-2.57%	14.01%	3.79%	-5.07%	7.86%	-1.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPR5.DE achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly higher than EMA5.DE's 0.75% return.

ZPR5.DE

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: 1.21%
• 6M: 2.84%
• 1Y: -1.62%
• 3Y*: 3.46%
• 5Y*: 2.56%
• 10Y*: 2.27%

EMA5.DE

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -0.48%
• YTD: 0.75%
• 6M: 2.85%
• 1Y: -0.95%
• 3Y*: 5.15%
• 5Y*: 2.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPR5.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPR5.DE has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than EMA5.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.

ZPR5.DE

SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF

EMA5.DE

L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

ZPR5.DE vs. EMA5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPR5.DE

ZPR5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7
ZPR5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
ZPR5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
ZPR5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7
ZPR5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
ZPR5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8

EMA5.DE

EMA5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9
EMA5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
EMA5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
EMA5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8
EMA5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EMA5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPR5.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (ZPR5.DE) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZPR5.DE	EMA5.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	-0.13	-0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.27	-0.13	-0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.98	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.24	-0.10	-0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.49	-0.22	-0.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZPR5.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPR5.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the EMA5.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPR5.DE and EMA5.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZPR5.DE	EMA5.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23	-0.13	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.37	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.44	-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between ZPR5.DE and EMA5.DE is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ZPR5.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Dividend Comparison

ZPR5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than EMA5.DE's 4.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ZPR5.DE SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF	4.87%	5.10%	4.16%	3.16%	2.54%	2.63%	3.53%	3.34%	2.73%	3.18%	2.72%	1.83%
EMA5.DE L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF	4.66%	5.61%	5.39%	4.22%	2.89%	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ZPR5.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPR5.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.48%, which is greater than EMA5.DE's maximum drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPR5.DE and EMA5.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZPR5.DE	EMA5.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.48%	-10.01%	-4.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.88%	-6.02%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.92%	-10.01%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.15%	-4.67%	-0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.88%	-3.53%	-1.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.29%	2.00%	+0.29%

Volatility

ZPR5.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (ZPR5.DE) is 1.89%, while L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE) has a volatility of 2.05%. This indicates that ZPR5.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMA5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZPR5.DE	EMA5.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.89%	2.05%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.89%	4.04%	-0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.88%	7.12%	-0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.08%	7.04%	+0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.25%	6.96%	+0.29%