ZJUN vs. ZMAR
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June (ZJUN) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR).
ZJUN and ZMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZJUN is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on May 30, 2025. ZMAR is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Mar 3, 2025.
Performance
ZJUN vs. ZMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZJUN vs. ZMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZJUN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June | 0.45% | 3.95% |
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March | 0.46% | 4.98% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ZJUN having a 0.45% return and ZMAR slightly higher at 0.46%.
ZJUN
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZMAR
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 7.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZJUN vs. ZMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ZJUN and ZMAR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Return for Risk
ZJUN vs. ZMAR — Risk / Return Rank
ZJUN
ZMAR
ZJUN vs. ZMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June (ZJUN) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZJUN | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.80 | 1.86 | +0.95 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZJUN and ZMAR is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ZJUN vs. ZMAR - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZJUN nor ZMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ZJUN vs. ZMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZJUN drawdown since its inception was -1.08%, smaller than the maximum ZMAR drawdown of -2.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZJUN and ZMAR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZJUN | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.08% | -2.30% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.65% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -0.25% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.38% | — |
Volatility
ZJUN vs. ZMAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZJUN | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91% | 3.11% | -1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.91% | 3.21% | -1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.91% | 3.21% | -1.30% |