PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF (ZGLH.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZGLH.TO
BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF
7.81%61.24%18.72%
ZNQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF
-4.69%14.60%25.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZGLH.TO achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than ZNQ.TO's -4.69% return.


ZGLH.TO

1D
4.00%
1M
-11.16%
YTD
7.81%
6M
19.83%
1Y
46.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZNQ.TO

1D
3.23%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
-4.69%
6M
-4.08%
1Y
19.05%
3Y*
23.10%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZGLH.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than ZNQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZGLH.TO
ZGLH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ZGLH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZGLH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZGLH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZGLH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZGLH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ZNQ.TO
ZNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF (ZGLH.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZGLH.TOZNQ.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

0.85

+0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

1.30

+0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.19

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.49

+0.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.14

4.40

+4.74

ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGLH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGLH.TO and ZNQ.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZGLH.TOZNQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

0.85

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.92

0.89

+1.03

Correlation

The correlation between ZGLH.TO and ZNQ.TO is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZGLH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZNQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
ZGLH.TO
BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZNQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF
0.26%0.25%0.30%0.35%0.23%0.12%0.47%0.52%

Drawdowns

ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGLH.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.51%, smaller than the maximum ZNQ.TO drawdown of -32.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGLH.TO and ZNQ.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZGLH.TOZNQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.51%

-32.09%

+12.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.51%

-13.03%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.47%

-9.67%

-3.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.71%

-6.76%

+4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

4.42%

+0.88%

Volatility

ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF (ZGLH.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) at 6.36%. This indicates that ZGLH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZNQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZGLH.TOZNQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.24%

6.36%

+4.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.59%

12.64%

+10.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.19%

22.57%

+4.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.13%

20.84%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.13%

22.46%

-0.33%