ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF (ZGLH.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO).
ZGLH.TO and ZNQ.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZGLH.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Mar 8, 2024. ZNQ.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Feb 11, 2019.
Performance
ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZGLH.TO BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF | 7.81% | 61.24% | 18.72% |
ZNQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF | -4.69% | 14.60% | 25.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZGLH.TO achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than ZNQ.TO's -4.69% return.
ZGLH.TO
- 1D
- 4.00%
- 1M
- -11.16%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 19.83%
- 1Y
- 46.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZNQ.TO
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- -4.69%
- 6M
- -4.08%
- 1Y
- 19.05%
- 3Y*
- 23.10%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZGLH.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than ZNQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZGLH.TO
ZNQ.TO
ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF (ZGLH.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZGLH.TO | ZNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.71 | 0.85 | +0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.15 | 1.30 | +0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.19 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 1.49 | +0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 4.40 | +4.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZGLH.TO | ZNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 0.85 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.92 | 0.89 | +1.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZGLH.TO and ZNQ.TO is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZGLH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZNQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGLH.TO BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZNQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF | 0.26% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.47% | 0.52% |
Drawdowns
ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZGLH.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.51%, smaller than the maximum ZNQ.TO drawdown of -32.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGLH.TO and ZNQ.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZGLH.TO | ZNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.51% | -32.09% | +12.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.51% | -13.03% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.47% | -9.67% | -3.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.71% | -6.76% | +4.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.30% | 4.42% | +0.88% |
Volatility
ZGLH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF (ZGLH.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) at 6.36%. This indicates that ZGLH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZNQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZGLH.TO | ZNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.24% | 6.36% | +4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.59% | 12.64% | +10.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.19% | 22.57% | +4.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 20.84% | +1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 22.46% | -0.33% |