ZGLH.TO vs. ZLB.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF (ZGLH.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO).
ZGLH.TO and ZLB.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZGLH.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Mar 8, 2024. ZLB.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Oct 21, 2011.
Performance
ZGLH.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZGLH.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZGLH.TO BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF | 7.81% | 61.24% | 18.72% |
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 1.42% | 20.31% | 10.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZGLH.TO achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than ZLB.TO's 1.42% return.
ZGLH.TO
- 1D
- 4.00%
- 1M
- -11.16%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 19.83%
- 1Y
- 46.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZLB.TO
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- 1Y
- 15.44%
- 3Y*
- 12.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZGLH.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZGLH.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than ZLB.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZGLH.TO vs. ZLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZGLH.TO
ZLB.TO
ZGLH.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF (ZGLH.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZGLH.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.71 | 1.48 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.15 | 1.99 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.57 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 8.71 | +0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZGLH.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 1.48 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.92 | 1.12 | +0.80 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZGLH.TO and ZLB.TO is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ZGLH.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZGLH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGLH.TO BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 1.92% | 1.93% | 2.28% | 2.56% | 2.56% | 2.29% | 2.72% | 2.34% | 2.65% | 2.42% | 2.82% | 2.25% |
Drawdowns
ZGLH.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZGLH.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.51%, smaller than the maximum ZLB.TO drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGLH.TO and ZLB.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZGLH.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.51% | -33.96% | +14.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.51% | -6.53% | -12.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.47% | -3.08% | -10.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.71% | -2.51% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.30% | 1.93% | +3.37% |
Volatility
ZGLH.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF (ZGLH.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) at 3.64%. This indicates that ZGLH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZGLH.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.24% | 3.64% | +7.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.59% | 7.64% | +15.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.19% | 10.52% | +16.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 9.57% | +12.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 12.19% | +9.94% |