ZGLH.TO vs. AMAX.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF (ZGLH.TO) and Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (AMAX.TO).

ZGLH.TO and AMAX.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZGLH.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Mar 8, 2024. AMAX.TO is an actively managed fund by Hamilton Capital. It was launched on Feb 6, 2024.

Performance

ZGLH.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF (ZGLH.TO) and Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (AMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZGLH.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ZGLH.TO BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF	7.81%	61.24%	18.72%
AMAX.TO Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	4.61%	113.79%	20.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZGLH.TO achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than AMAX.TO's 4.61% return.

ZGLH.TO

• 1D: 4.00%
• 1M: -11.16%
• YTD: 7.81%
• 6M: 19.83%
• 1Y: 46.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMAX.TO

• 1D: 5.62%
• 1M: -18.54%
• YTD: 4.61%
• 6M: 13.47%
• 1Y: 68.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZGLH.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZGLH.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

AMAX.TO

Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF

ZGLH.TO

BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF

Return for Risk

ZGLH.TO vs. AMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZGLH.TO

ZGLH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 82
ZGLH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
ZGLH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ZGLH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 81
ZGLH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ZGLH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

AMAX.TO

AMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 84
AMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
AMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
AMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
AMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
AMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGLH.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF (ZGLH.TO) and Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (AMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZGLH.TO	AMAX.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	1.75	-0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	2.10	+0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.31	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	2.47	+0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.14	9.13	+0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZGLH.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGLH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the AMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGLH.TO and AMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZGLH.TO	AMAX.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.71	1.75	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.92	1.96	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between ZGLH.TO and AMAX.TO is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ZGLH.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZGLH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%.

	TTM	2025	2024
ZGLH.TO BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AMAX.TO Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	6.91%	7.11%	11.22%

Drawdowns

ZGLH.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGLH.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.51%, smaller than the maximum AMAX.TO drawdown of -28.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGLH.TO and AMAX.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZGLH.TO	AMAX.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.51%	-28.60%	+9.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.51%	-28.60%	+9.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.47%	-18.54%	+5.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.71%	-4.66%	+1.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.30%	7.74%	-2.44%

Volatility

ZGLH.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Gold Bullion Hedged to CAD ETF (ZGLH.TO) is 11.24%, while Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (AMAX.TO) has a volatility of 16.54%. This indicates that ZGLH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZGLH.TO	AMAX.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.24%	16.54%	-5.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.59%	33.06%	-9.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.19%	39.73%	-12.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.13%	33.11%	-10.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.13%	33.11%	-10.98%