PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZESG.TO vs. TGRO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZESG.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Balanced ESG ETF (ZESG.TO) and TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZESG.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
-1.23%12.26%16.70%15.27%-13.70%13.20%4.73%
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
0.84%18.03%22.28%18.36%-11.39%20.46%1,952.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZESG.TO achieves a -1.23% return, which is significantly lower than TGRO.TO's 0.84% return.


ZESG.TO

1D
0.51%
1M
-2.95%
YTD
-1.23%
6M
-0.17%
1Y
11.61%
3Y*
12.14%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*

TGRO.TO

1D
0.64%
1M
-3.22%
YTD
0.84%
6M
3.05%
1Y
18.65%
3Y*
17.14%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZESG.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZESG.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than TGRO.TO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ZESG.TO vs. TGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZESG.TO
ZESG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ZESG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZESG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZESG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ZESG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZESG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

TGRO.TO
TGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZESG.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Balanced ESG ETF (ZESG.TO) and TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZESG.TOTGRO.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

1.37

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

1.89

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

1.80

-0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.48

8.08

-1.61

ZESG.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZESG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZESG.TO and TGRO.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZESG.TOTGRO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.37

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

1.02

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.93

0.12

-2.05

Correlation

The correlation between ZESG.TO and TGRO.TO is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ZESG.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZESG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than TGRO.TO's 1.97% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
ZESG.TO
BMO Balanced ESG ETF
1.77%1.71%1.89%2.22%2.53%2.05%2.27%
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
1.97%2.03%2.04%2.17%2.46%1.58%0.83%

Drawdowns

ZESG.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZESG.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than TGRO.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZESG.TO and TGRO.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZESG.TOTGRO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-18.37%

-81.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-10.35%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.81%

-18.37%

-0.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-3.78%

-96.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-99.93%

-3.54%

-96.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.30%

-0.48%

Volatility

ZESG.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Balanced ESG ETF (ZESG.TO) is 3.58%, while TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that ZESG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZESG.TOTGRO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

5.01%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.29%

8.13%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.08%

13.72%

-4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.85%

11.64%

-2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.48%

768.01%

-726.53%