ZEQL.TO vs. ZEB.TO
ZEQL.TO (BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units)) and ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — ZEQL.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index, while ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZEQL.TO charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ZEB.TO.
Performance
ZEQL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
ZEQL.TO
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZEB.TO
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 10.54%
- YTD
- 11.16%
- 6M
- 24.06%
- 1Y
- 71.17%
- 3Y*
- 28.60%
- 5Y*
- 18.60%
- 10Y*
- 15.33%
ZEQL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZEQL.TO BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) | -0.18% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 6.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZEQL.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZEQL.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZEQL.TO
ZEB.TO
ZEQL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) (ZEQL.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZEQL.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 6.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.86 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
ZEQL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZEQL.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.12%, smaller than the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEQL.TO and ZEB.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZEQL.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -39.69% | +33.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | 0.00% | -1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -5.69% | +3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.91% | — |
Volatility
ZEQL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZEQL.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.46% | 11.62% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.46% | 13.30% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.46% | 16.84% | -3.38% |
ZEQL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZEQL.TO has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ZEB.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZEQL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZEQL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than ZEB.TO's 2.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEQL.TO BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.70% | 2.95% | 3.98% | 4.75% | 4.29% | 3.13% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.64% | 3.02% | 3.19% | 3.70% |