ZEQL.TO vs. ZCN.TO
ZEQL.TO (BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units)) and ZCN.TO (BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — ZEQL.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index, while ZCN.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZEQL.TO charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ZCN.TO.
Performance
ZEQL.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
ZEQL.TO
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCN.TO
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 13.59%
- 1Y
- 46.27%
- 3Y*
- 21.72%
- 5Y*
- 15.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.88%
ZEQL.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZEQL.TO BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) | -0.18% |
ZCN.TO BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 3.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZEQL.TO and ZCN.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZEQL.TO vs. ZCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZEQL.TO
ZCN.TO
ZEQL.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) (ZEQL.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZEQL.TO | ZCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.67 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
ZEQL.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZEQL.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.12%, smaller than the maximum ZCN.TO drawdown of -37.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEQL.TO and ZCN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZEQL.TO | ZCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -37.18% | +31.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -0.94% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -4.79% | +2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.94% | — |
Volatility
ZEQL.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZEQL.TO | ZCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.46% | 12.23% | +1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.46% | 13.03% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.46% | 14.96% | -1.50% |
ZEQL.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZEQL.TO has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCN.TO's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZEQL.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZEQL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than ZCN.TO's 2.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEQL.TO BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZCN.TO BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 2.08% | 2.22% | 2.78% | 3.29% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.24% | 3.13% | 3.16% | 2.71% | 2.84% | 3.33% |