PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZDM.TO vs. XEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

ZDM.TO vs. XEQT.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZDM.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO).

ZDM.TO and XEQT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZDM.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2009. XEQT.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Aug 7, 2019.

Performance

ZDM.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZDM.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZDM.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ZDM.TO
BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF		2.47%20.34%12.72%18.62%-5.78%18.93%0.25%13.32%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		0.66%19.47%24.36%17.25%-11.01%18.94%11.82%9.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZDM.TO achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly higher than XEQT.TO's 0.66% return.

ZDM.TO

1D
2.49%
1M
-5.42%
YTD
2.47%
6M
7.97%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
14.85%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*
10.59%

XEQT.TO

1D
2.80%
1M
-4.49%
YTD
0.66%
6M
2.68%
1Y
20.05%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF

iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio

Often compared with ZDM.TO:
ZDM.TO vs. ZEA.TOZDM.TO vs. FCCM.NEOZDM.TO vs. VIU.TOZDM.TO vs. VI.TOZDM.TO vs. EQCL.TOZDM.TO vs. XEF.TOZDM.TO vs. VFV.TO
Often compared with XEQT.TO:
XEQT.TO vs. VFV.TOXEQT.TO vs. VEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. XGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. ZEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. VGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. XEI.TOXEQT.TO vs. XAW.TO

ZDM.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZDM.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than XEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

ZDM.TO
BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio

Return for Risk

ZDM.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZDM.TO
ZDM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ZDM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO
XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZDM.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZDM.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ZDM.TOXEQT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

1.26

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

1.76

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

1.75

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.96

7.85

-1.89

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZDM.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZDM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZDM.TO and XEQT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ZDM.TOXEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.26

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.91

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.85

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between ZDM.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ZDM.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZDM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than XEQT.TO's 1.66% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZDM.TO
BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF		2.04%2.13%2.71%2.97%3.20%2.38%2.80%2.90%3.21%2.41%3.23%2.46%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		1.66%1.66%2.01%2.07%2.12%1.64%1.66%1.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ZDM.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZDM.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, which is greater than XEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDM.TO and XEQT.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

ZDM.TOXEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.13%

-29.74%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.25%

-11.78%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.63%

-19.56%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.13%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.97%

-5.08%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-4.20%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.63%

+0.12%

Volatility

ZDM.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZDM.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) at 6.01%. This indicates that ZDM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

ZDM.TOXEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

6.01%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.79%

9.46%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.82%

15.98%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.63%

13.03%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.80%

15.63%

+0.17%