PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZDM.TO vs. FCIM.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

ZDM.TO vs. FCIM.NEO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZDM.TO) and Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO).

ZDM.TO and FCIM.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZDM.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2009. FCIM.NEO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Canada International Momentum Index. It was launched on Jun 5, 2020. Both ZDM.TO and FCIM.NEO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ZDM.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZDM.TO) and Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZDM.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ZDM.TO
BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF		2.47%20.34%12.72%18.62%-5.78%18.93%8.79%
FCIM.NEO
Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF		7.74%37.03%25.38%16.54%-12.40%10.86%-60.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZDM.TO achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly lower than FCIM.NEO's 7.74% return.

ZDM.TO

1D
2.49%
1M
-5.42%
YTD
2.47%
6M
7.97%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
14.85%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*
10.59%

FCIM.NEO

1D
3.44%
1M
-7.35%
YTD
7.74%
6M
15.87%
1Y
32.19%
3Y*
26.47%
5Y*
16.26%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF

Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF

Often compared with ZDM.TO:
ZDM.TO vs. ZEA.TOZDM.TO vs. FCCM.NEOZDM.TO vs. VIU.TOZDM.TO vs. VI.TOZDM.TO vs. EQCL.TOZDM.TO vs. XEF.TOZDM.TO vs. VFV.TO
Often compared with FCIM.NEO:
FCIM.NEO vs. EBNK.TOFCIM.NEO vs. VXM.TOFCIM.NEO vs. VCN.TOFCIM.NEO vs. FCIV.TOFCIM.NEO vs. XEF.TOFCIM.NEO vs. FCCM.NEOFCIM.NEO vs. JIVE

ZDM.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZDM.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FCIM.NEO's 0.45% expense ratio.

FCIM.NEO
Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF
ZDM.TO
BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF

Return for Risk

ZDM.TO vs. FCIM.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZDM.TO
ZDM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ZDM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
FCIM.NEO
FCIM.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FCIM.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCIM.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCIM.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FCIM.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCIM.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZDM.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZDM.TO) and Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ZDM.TOFCIM.NEODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

1.79

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

2.54

-0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

2.47

-1.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.96

9.60

-3.65

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZDM.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZDM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the FCIM.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZDM.TO and FCIM.NEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ZDM.TOFCIM.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.79

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.99

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

-0.10

+0.60

Correlation

The correlation between ZDM.TO and FCIM.NEO is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ZDM.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Dividend Comparison

ZDM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than FCIM.NEO's 1.48% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZDM.TO
BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF		2.04%2.13%2.71%2.97%3.20%2.38%2.80%2.90%3.21%2.41%3.23%2.46%
FCIM.NEO
Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF		1.48%1.59%1.26%1.70%1.86%2.70%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ZDM.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZDM.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum FCIM.NEO drawdown of -67.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDM.TO and FCIM.NEO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

ZDM.TOFCIM.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.13%

-67.91%

+34.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.25%

-13.21%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.63%

-26.89%

+11.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.13%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.97%

-18.52%

+12.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-52.34%

+47.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

3.40%

-0.65%

Volatility

ZDM.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZDM.TO) is 6.56%, while Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO) has a volatility of 8.40%. This indicates that ZDM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCIM.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

ZDM.TOFCIM.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

8.40%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.79%

12.15%

-2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.82%

18.06%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.63%

16.61%

-2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.80%

32.29%

-16.49%