ZDI.TO vs. FLVI.NEO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO International Dividend ETF (ZDI.TO) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVI.NEO).
ZDI.TO and FLVI.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZDI.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Nov 5, 2014. FLVI.NEO is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the Franklin International ex North America Low Volatility High Dividend Index. It was launched on Mar 25, 2024.
Performance
ZDI.TO vs. FLVI.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZDI.TO vs. FLVI.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZDI.TO BMO International Dividend ETF | 6.64% | 22.48% | 3.25% |
FLVI.NEO Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 6.07% | 33.34% | 9.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZDI.TO achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly higher than FLVI.NEO's 6.07% return.
ZDI.TO
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 6.64%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 18.85%
- 3Y*
- 16.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
FLVI.NEO
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- 6.07%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZDI.TO vs. FLVI.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
ZDI.TO vs. FLVI.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
ZDI.TO
FLVI.NEO
ZDI.TO vs. FLVI.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO International Dividend ETF (ZDI.TO) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVI.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZDI.TO | FLVI.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | 1.78 | -0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 2.53 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.38 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 2.44 | -0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.45 | 9.35 | -2.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZDI.TO | FLVI.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.78 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 1.88 | -1.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZDI.TO and FLVI.NEO is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ZDI.TO vs. FLVI.NEO - Dividend Comparison
ZDI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than FLVI.NEO's 1.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZDI.TO BMO International Dividend ETF | 3.15% | 3.34% | 3.94% | 4.15% | 3.99% | 3.72% | 4.96% | 4.92% | 5.23% | 4.23% | 4.62% | 4.26% |
FLVI.NEO Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 1.99% | 3.07% | 3.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ZDI.TO vs. FLVI.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZDI.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than FLVI.NEO's maximum drawdown of -11.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDI.TO and FLVI.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZDI.TO | FLVI.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -11.90% | -21.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -10.04% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.76% | -4.22% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -1.55% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 2.71% | +0.16% |
Volatility
ZDI.TO vs. FLVI.NEO - Volatility Comparison
BMO International Dividend ETF (ZDI.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVI.NEO) at 4.65%. This indicates that ZDI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLVI.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZDI.TO | FLVI.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 4.65% | +2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 7.39% | +2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.48% | 14.45% | +1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 12.99% | -0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 12.99% | +2.75% |