ZCON.TO vs. XCNS.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Conservative ETF (ZCON.TO) and iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO).
ZCON.TO and XCNS.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZCON.TO is managed by BMO. It was launched on Feb 12, 2019. XCNS.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Aug 7, 2019.
Performance
ZCON.TO vs. XCNS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZCON.TO vs. XCNS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZCON.TO BMO Conservative ETF | 0.31% | 9.31% | 11.51% | 9.89% | -11.00% | 6.06% | 9.69% | 2.88% |
XCNS.TO iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio | 0.28% | 9.44% | 11.73% | 10.66% | -11.25% | 5.93% | 10.28% | 3.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZCON.TO achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly higher than XCNS.TO's 0.28% return.
ZCON.TO
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -2.78%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 8.64%
- 3Y*
- 8.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- —
XCNS.TO
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 8.57%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.95%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZCON.TO vs. XCNS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZCON.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XCNS.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ZCON.TO vs. XCNS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZCON.TO
XCNS.TO
ZCON.TO vs. XCNS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Conservative ETF (ZCON.TO) and iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZCON.TO | XCNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 1.14 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 1.56 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 1.58 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 5.83 | +0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZCON.TO | XCNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 1.14 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.74 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.78 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCON.TO and XCNS.TO is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ZCON.TO vs. XCNS.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZCON.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than XCNS.TO's 2.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZCON.TO BMO Conservative ETF | 2.16% | 2.36% | 2.49% | 2.71% | 2.89% | 2.50% | 2.59% | 2.51% |
XCNS.TO iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio | 2.63% | 2.55% | 2.58% | 2.49% | 2.26% | 1.81% | 2.15% | 0.92% |
Drawdowns
ZCON.TO vs. XCNS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCON.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.22%, roughly equal to the maximum XCNS.TO drawdown of -16.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCON.TO and XCNS.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCON.TO | XCNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.22% | -16.96% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.76% | -5.60% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.88% | -16.09% | +0.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -3.00% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -3.56% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.49% | 1.52% | -0.03% |
Volatility
ZCON.TO vs. XCNS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Conservative ETF (ZCON.TO) is 3.02%, while iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (XCNS.TO) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that ZCON.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCNS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZCON.TO | XCNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 3.47% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.68% | 5.06% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.64% | 7.55% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.17% | 6.72% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.02% | 7.57% | +0.45% |