PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZCH.TO vs. ZQQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

ZCH.TO vs. ZQQ.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BMO MSCI China ESG Leaders Index ETF (ZCH.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO).

ZCH.TO and ZQQ.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZCH.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the MSCI China ESG Leaders Index. It was launched on Jan 19, 2010. ZQQ.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 19, 2010. Both ZCH.TO and ZQQ.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ZCH.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI China ESG Leaders Index ETF (ZCH.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZCH.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZCH.TO
BMO MSCI China ESG Leaders Index ETF		-7.80%33.25%25.33%-11.83%-23.85%-41.03%37.62%17.26%-16.63%37.66%
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)		-6.55%18.38%24.00%52.52%-33.75%26.68%45.33%37.08%-2.29%31.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZCH.TO achieves a -7.80% return, which is significantly lower than ZQQ.TO's -6.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ZCH.TO has underperformed ZQQ.TO with an annualized return of 1.36%, while ZQQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.14% annualized return.

ZCH.TO

1D
3.02%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
-7.80%
6M
-17.83%
1Y
-0.37%
3Y*
7.64%
5Y*
-8.57%
10Y*
1.36%

ZQQ.TO

1D
3.44%
1M
-5.14%
YTD
-6.55%
6M
-4.71%
1Y
20.77%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
17.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO MSCI China ESG Leaders Index ETF

BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)

Often compared with ZCH.TO:
ZCH.TO vs. XCH.TOZCH.TO vs. KWEBZCH.TO vs. HCAL.TOZCH.TO vs. XCHP.TOZCH.TO vs. XIU.TOZCH.TO vs. VEE.TOZCH.TO vs. VUN.TO
Often compared with ZQQ.TO:
ZQQ.TO vs. ZNQ.TOZQQ.TO vs. XQQ.TOZQQ.TO vs. QQC.TOZQQ.TO vs. QQQZQQ.TO vs. VFV.TOZQQ.TO vs. ZSP.TOZQQ.TO vs. TEC.TO

ZCH.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCH.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than ZQQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.

ZCH.TO
BMO MSCI China ESG Leaders Index ETF
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)

Return for Risk

ZCH.TO vs. ZQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZCH.TO
ZCH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ZCH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO
ZQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCH.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI China ESG Leaders Index ETF (ZCH.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ZCH.TOZQQ.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.01

0.94

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.16

1.49

-1.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.21

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

1.62

-1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.03

5.71

-5.68

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZCH.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZCH.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZCH.TO and ZQQ.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ZCH.TOZQQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

0.94

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

0.50

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

0.77

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.83

-0.71

Correlation

The correlation between ZCH.TO and ZQQ.TO is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ZCH.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZCH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than ZQQ.TO's 0.28% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZCH.TO
BMO MSCI China ESG Leaders Index ETF		1.38%1.28%2.22%3.96%1.21%0.00%0.51%1.18%1.32%0.56%1.65%0.81%
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)		0.28%0.27%0.37%0.32%0.45%0.14%0.41%0.51%0.64%0.57%1.60%0.81%

Drawdowns

ZCH.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCH.TO drawdown since its inception was -73.84%, which is greater than ZQQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCH.TO and ZQQ.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

ZCH.TOZQQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.84%

-36.39%

-37.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.13%

-12.86%

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.07%

-36.39%

-29.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.84%

-36.39%

-37.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.35%

-9.86%

-41.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.35%

-5.41%

-20.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.33%

3.65%

+5.68%

Volatility

ZCH.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO MSCI China ESG Leaders Index ETF (ZCH.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) at 6.59%. This indicates that ZCH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZQQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

ZCH.TOZQQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.08%

6.59%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.23%

12.63%

+3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.23%

22.20%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.95%

22.59%

+10.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.49%

22.36%

+6.13%