ZBBB.TO vs. FCSB.NEO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO BBB Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZBBB.TO) and Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO).
ZBBB.TO and FCSB.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZBBB.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the FTSE Canada 1-10 Year BBB Corporate Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 28, 2020. FCSB.NEO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the FTSE Canada Short Term Corporate Bond 5% Capped Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2019. Both ZBBB.TO and FCSB.NEO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ZBBB.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZBBB.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZBBB.TO BMO BBB Corporate Bond Index ETF | 0.10% | 4.73% | 8.00% | 5.61% | -5.28% | -1.12% | 6.72% |
FCSB.NEO Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.36% | 4.15% | 7.55% | 6.81% | -4.22% | -0.81% | 5.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZBBB.TO achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than FCSB.NEO's 0.36% return.
ZBBB.TO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 3.42%
- 3Y*
- 6.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.66%
- 10Y*
- —
FCSB.NEO
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 3.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.73%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZBBB.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZBBB.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSB.NEO's 0.44% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZBBB.TO vs. FCSB.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
ZBBB.TO
FCSB.NEO
ZBBB.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO BBB Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZBBB.TO) and Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZBBB.TO | FCSB.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 1.10 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.61 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.20 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 1.99 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 7.87 | -2.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZBBB.TO | FCSB.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.10 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.83 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.63 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZBBB.TO and FCSB.NEO is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ZBBB.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Dividend Comparison
ZBBB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than FCSB.NEO's 3.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZBBB.TO BMO BBB Corporate Bond Index ETF | 4.25% | 4.12% | 3.72% | 3.47% | 3.54% | 3.23% | 3.10% | 0.00% |
FCSB.NEO Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF | 3.79% | 3.73% | 3.59% | 3.06% | 2.09% | 1.58% | 2.34% | 0.38% |
Drawdowns
ZBBB.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZBBB.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.55%, smaller than the maximum FCSB.NEO drawdown of -12.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBBB.TO and FCSB.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZBBB.TO | FCSB.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.55% | -12.48% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.91% | -1.58% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.23% | -7.44% | -3.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -0.92% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -1.53% | -1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 0.40% | +0.25% |
Volatility
ZBBB.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO BBB Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZBBB.TO) is 1.06%, while Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that ZBBB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCSB.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZBBB.TO | FCSB.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 1.25% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.84% | 2.04% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.26% | 2.81% | +0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.35% | 3.29% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 5.00% | +0.87% |