YTSL.NEO vs. HLIF.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YTSL.NEO) and Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO).
YTSL.NEO and HLIF.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. YTSL.NEO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Dec 19, 2022. HLIF.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Jun 8, 2022.
Performance
YTSL.NEO vs. HLIF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
YTSL.NEO vs. HLIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YTSL.NEO Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | -15.65% | 27.43% | 46.11% | 106.56% | -20.20% |
HLIF.TO Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A | 9.41% | 25.43% | 17.21% | 6.13% | 1.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YTSL.NEO achieves a -15.65% return, which is significantly lower than HLIF.TO's 9.41% return.
YTSL.NEO
- 1D
- 7.76%
- 1M
- -6.01%
- YTD
- -15.65%
- 6M
- -4.28%
- 1Y
- 71.44%
- 3Y*
- 26.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HLIF.TO
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 6M
- 16.84%
- 1Y
- 33.00%
- 3Y*
- 18.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
YTSL.NEO vs. HLIF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
YTSL.NEO has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HLIF.TO's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
YTSL.NEO vs. HLIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
YTSL.NEO
HLIF.TO
YTSL.NEO vs. HLIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YTSL.NEO) and Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YTSL.NEO | HLIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 3.46 | -2.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 4.36 | -2.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.80 | -0.55 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 3.95 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.75 | 24.28 | -15.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YTSL.NEO | HLIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 3.46 | -2.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.35 | -0.81 |
Correlation
The correlation between YTSL.NEO and HLIF.TO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
YTSL.NEO vs. HLIF.TO - Dividend Comparison
YTSL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.25%, more than HLIF.TO's 6.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YTSL.NEO Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 47.25% | 36.11% | 12.80% | 24.07% | 1.96% |
HLIF.TO Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A | 6.13% | 6.26% | 7.33% | 7.96% | 3.91% |
Drawdowns
YTSL.NEO vs. HLIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YTSL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -58.40%, which is greater than HLIF.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YTSL.NEO and HLIF.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| YTSL.NEO | HLIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.40% | -11.12% | -47.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.95% | -8.43% | -15.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.60% | 0.00% | -16.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.85% | -2.10% | -18.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.89% | 1.38% | +7.51% |
Volatility
YTSL.NEO vs. HLIF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YTSL.NEO) has a higher volatility of 14.81% compared to Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO) at 3.12%. This indicates that YTSL.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLIF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| YTSL.NEO | HLIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.81% | 3.12% | +11.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.59% | 5.56% | +27.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.99% | 9.58% | +44.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.89% | 10.58% | +52.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.89% | 10.58% | +52.31% |