PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMAG.L vs. GOOO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YMAG.L vs. GOOO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Big Tech Option Income UCITS ETF (YMAG.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YMAG.L vs. GOOO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

YMAG.L is traded in USD, while GOOO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GOOO.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAG.L achieves a -14.26% return, which is significantly lower than GOOO.L's -6.21% return.


YMAG.L

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
-14.26%
6M
-17.82%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOO.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
-5.17%
YTD
-6.21%
6M
10.14%
1Y
59.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YMAG.L vs. GOOO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAG.L has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOO.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

YMAG.L vs. GOOO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAG.L
YMAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
YMAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOO.L
GOOO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GOOO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMAG.L vs. GOOO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Big Tech Option Income UCITS ETF (YMAG.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YMAG.LGOOO.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.18

2.28

-2.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.40

3.01

-2.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.37

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

3.86

-3.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.99

14.27

-13.27

YMAG.L vs. GOOO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the GOOO.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAG.L and GOOO.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YMAG.LGOOO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

2.28

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

1.38

-1.34

Correlation

The correlation between YMAG.L and GOOO.L is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

YMAG.L vs. GOOO.L - Dividend Comparison

YMAG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.44%, more than GOOO.L's 19.31% yield.


TTM20252024
YMAG.L
YieldMax Big Tech Option Income UCITS ETF
25.44%17.22%0.00%
GOOO.L
IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP
19.31%11.49%1.94%

Drawdowns

YMAG.L vs. GOOO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.01%, smaller than the maximum GOOO.L drawdown of -26.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAG.L and GOOO.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


YMAG.LGOOO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.01%

-28.28%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.01%

-13.85%

-9.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.66%

-11.31%

-9.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-7.92%

+1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.65%

4.07%

+4.58%

Volatility

YMAG.L vs. GOOO.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Big Tech Option Income UCITS ETF (YMAG.L) is 5.03%, while IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that YMAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


YMAG.LGOOO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

6.46%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

16.52%

-2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.10%

26.17%

-4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.35%

25.86%

-3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

25.86%

-3.51%