PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYZY vs. XYLP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XYZY vs. XYLP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF (XYZY) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF (XYLP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XYZY vs. XYLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XYZY
YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF
-11.33%-29.43%21.72%44.45%
XYLP.L
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF
-1.86%6.27%17.05%2.42%
Different Trading Currencies

XYZY is traded in USD, while XYLP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XYLP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYZY achieves a -11.33% return, which is significantly lower than XYLP.L's -1.86% return.


XYZY

1D
0.52%
1M
-3.85%
YTD
-11.33%
6M
-22.92%
1Y
-8.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XYLP.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
-2.14%
YTD
-1.86%
6M
2.58%
1Y
7.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XYZY vs. XYLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYZY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLP.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XYZY vs. XYLP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYZY
XYZY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XYZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYZY Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XYZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYZY Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLP.L
XYLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XYLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYZY vs. XYLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF (XYZY) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF (XYLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XYZYXYLP.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.19

0.58

-0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.04

0.88

-0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.14

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

2.10

-2.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.35

9.34

-9.69

XYZY vs. XYLP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYZY Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the XYLP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYZY and XYLP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XYZYXYLP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

0.58

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.74

-0.65

Correlation

The correlation between XYZY and XYLP.L is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XYZY vs. XYLP.L - Dividend Comparison

XYZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 111.45%, more than XYLP.L's 7.97% yield.


TTM202520242023
XYZY
YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF
111.45%95.35%62.54%9.85%
XYLP.L
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF
7.97%9.01%6.22%3.98%

Drawdowns

XYZY vs. XYLP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYZY drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, which is greater than XYLP.L's maximum drawdown of -16.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYZY and XYLP.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XYZYXYLP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.30%

-19.30%

-33.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.72%

-4.58%

-33.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.33%

-6.63%

-37.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.80%

-5.02%

-15.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.99%

1.45%

+14.54%

Volatility

XYZY vs. XYLP.L - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF (XYZY) has a higher volatility of 11.42% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF (XYLP.L) at 3.04%. This indicates that XYZY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XYZYXYLP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.42%

3.04%

+8.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.37%

6.15%

+26.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.30%

12.63%

+32.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.73%

10.25%

+32.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.73%

10.25%

+32.48%