PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUT3.L vs. BBLL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XUT3.L vs. BBLL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers iBoxx USD Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XUT3.L vs. BBLL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

XUT3.L is traded in USD, while BBLL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BBLL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUT3.L achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than BBLL.L's 1.01% return.


XUT3.L

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
0.24%
6M
1.34%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
1.82%
10Y*
1.71%

BBLL.L

1D
0.28%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.01%
6M
2.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XUT3.L vs. BBLL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XUT3.L and BBLL.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XUT3.L vs. BBLL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUT3.L
XUT3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XUT3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

BBLL.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUT3.L vs. BBLL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers iBoxx USD Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUT3.LBBLL.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.87

XUT3.L vs. BBLL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUT3.LBBLL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.95

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between XUT3.L and BBLL.L is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

XUT3.L vs. BBLL.L - Dividend Comparison

XUT3.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, while BBLL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
XUT3.L
Xtrackers iBoxx USD Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D
2.85%2.70%2.35%1.80%1.00%2.89%2.43%1.16%1.00%0.69%
BBLL.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XUT3.L vs. BBLL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUT3.L drawdown since its inception was -5.45%, which is greater than BBLL.L's maximum drawdown of -0.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUT3.L and BBLL.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XUT3.LBBLL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-4.55%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.07%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.73%

-1.56%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

Volatility

XUT3.L vs. BBLL.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XUT3.LBBLL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24%

4.02%

-2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.88%

4.02%

-2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.49%

4.02%

-2.53%