PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XTOT.TO vs. TULV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

XTOT.TO vs. TULV.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF (XTOT.TO) and TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO).

XTOT.TO and TULV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XTOT.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Total Market Index. It was launched on May 28, 2025. TULV.TO is an actively managed fund by TD. It was launched on May 26, 2020.

Performance

XTOT.TO vs. TULV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF (XTOT.TO) and TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XTOT.TO vs. TULV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
XTOT.TO
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF		-2.69%15.99%
TULV.TO
TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF		3.26%3.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTOT.TO achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly lower than TULV.TO's 3.26% return.

XTOT.TO

1D
3.22%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
-2.69%
6M
-1.74%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

TULV.TO

1D
0.26%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
3.26%
6M
3.11%
1Y
-0.99%
3Y*
9.28%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF

TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF

Often compared with XTOT.TO:
XTOT.TO vs. ITOTXTOT.TO vs. XUU.TOXTOT.TO vs. VFV.TOXTOT.TO vs. VUN.TOXTOT.TO vs. XIC.TOXTOT.TO vs. XUS.TOXTOT.TO vs. XSP.TO
Often compared with TULV.TO:
TULV.TO vs. TCLV.TOTULV.TO vs. JEPI.TOTULV.TO vs. ZSP-U.TOTULV.TO vs. HULC.TOTULV.TO vs. KNGC.TOTULV.TO vs. ETSX.TOTULV.TO vs. CNCL.TO

XTOT.TO vs. TULV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTOT.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TULV.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.

TULV.TO
TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF
XTOT.TO
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF

Return for Risk

XTOT.TO vs. TULV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XTOT.TO
TULV.TO
TULV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TULV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTOT.TO vs. TULV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF (XTOT.TO) and TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XTOT.TO vs. TULV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XTOT.TOTULV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

-0.08

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.88

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.76

+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between XTOT.TO and TULV.TO is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

XTOT.TO vs. TULV.TO - Dividend Comparison

XTOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than TULV.TO's 1.77% yield.

TTM202520242023202220212020
XTOT.TO
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF		0.71%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TULV.TO
TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF		1.77%1.80%1.48%1.96%1.57%1.37%0.83%

Drawdowns

XTOT.TO vs. TULV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTOT.TO drawdown since its inception was -9.64%, smaller than the maximum TULV.TO drawdown of -11.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTOT.TO and TULV.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

XTOT.TOTULV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.64%

-11.78%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-9.87%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-11.78%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.73%

-4.02%

-2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-3.58%

+1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

5.63%

—

Volatility

XTOT.TO vs. TULV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

XTOT.TOTULV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

3.15%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

7.17%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

12.02%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.18%

12.01%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.18%

11.58%

+1.60%