XTOT.TO vs. FCUQ.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF (XTOT.TO) and Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF (FCUQ.TO).

XTOT.TO and FCUQ.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XTOT.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Total Market Index. It was launched on May 28, 2025. FCUQ.TO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Canada U.S. High Quality Index. It was launched on Jan 18, 2019. Both XTOT.TO and FCUQ.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XTOT.TO vs. FCUQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF (XTOT.TO) and Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF (FCUQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XTOT.TO vs. FCUQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XTOT.TO iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF	-2.69%	15.99%
FCUQ.TO Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF	-5.25%	5.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTOT.TO achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly higher than FCUQ.TO's -5.25% return.

XTOT.TO

• 1D: 3.22%
• 1M: -2.94%
• YTD: -2.69%
• 6M: -1.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FCUQ.TO

• 1D: 2.70%
• 1M: -5.88%
• YTD: -5.25%
• 6M: -7.98%
• 1Y: 0.81%
• 3Y*: 14.38%
• 5Y*: 11.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTOT.TO vs. FCUQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTOT.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FCUQ.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.

FCUQ.TO

Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF

XTOT.TO

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF

Return for Risk

XTOT.TO vs. FCUQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUQ.TO

FCUQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 13
FCUQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
FCUQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
FCUQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 13
FCUQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FCUQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTOT.TO vs. FCUQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF (XTOT.TO) and Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF (FCUQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XTOT.TO	FCUQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.18	0.82	+0.36

Correlation

The correlation between XTOT.TO and FCUQ.TO is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XTOT.TO vs. FCUQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

XTOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than FCUQ.TO's 0.76% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XTOT.TO iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF	0.71%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FCUQ.TO Fidelity U.S. High Quality ETF	0.76%	0.73%	0.77%	0.88%	1.04%	0.79%	1.15%	0.82%

Drawdowns

XTOT.TO vs. FCUQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTOT.TO drawdown since its inception was -9.64%, smaller than the maximum FCUQ.TO drawdown of -25.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTOT.TO and FCUQ.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTOT.TO	FCUQ.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.64%	-25.36%	+15.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.14%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.73%	-9.46%	+2.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.94%	-4.31%	+2.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XTOT.TO	FCUQ.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.38%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.22%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.18%	17.25%	-4.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.18%	14.58%	-1.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.18%	17.41%	-4.23%