XSOE.DE vs. IEMA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises UCITS ETF (XSOE.DE) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L).
XSOE.DE and IEMA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSOE.DE is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises ESG Screened. It was launched on Aug 18, 2021. IEMA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both XSOE.DE and IEMA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XSOE.DE vs. IEMA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XSOE.DE vs. IEMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSOE.DE WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises UCITS ETF | 3.47% | 16.93% | 10.26% | 6.05% | -19.00% | 3.24% |
IEMA.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.78% | 18.46% | 14.71% | 6.15% | -15.28% | 3.51% |
Different Trading Currencies
XSOE.DE is traded in EUR, while IEMA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IEMA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSOE.DE achieves a 3.47% return, which is significantly lower than IEMA.L's 4.78% return.
XSOE.DE
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- -5.72%
- YTD
- 3.47%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 23.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEMA.L
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- 4.78%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 24.63%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- 4.40%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XSOE.DE vs. IEMA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSOE.DE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMA.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XSOE.DE vs. IEMA.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSOE.DE
IEMA.L
XSOE.DE vs. IEMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises UCITS ETF (XSOE.DE) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSOE.DE | IEMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 1.31 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 1.80 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.25 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.73 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.92 | 9.93 | -2.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSOE.DE | IEMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 1.31 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.33 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between XSOE.DE and IEMA.L is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XSOE.DE vs. IEMA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSOE.DE nor IEMA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XSOE.DE vs. IEMA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSOE.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.69%, smaller than the maximum IEMA.L drawdown of -35.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSOE.DE and IEMA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSOE.DE | IEMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.69% | -39.66% | +11.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.15% | -12.76% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -10.67% | +2.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -15.43% | +2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 3.37% | -0.34% |
Volatility
XSOE.DE vs. IEMA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises UCITS ETF (XSOE.DE) is 7.23%, while iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that XSOE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XSOE.DE | IEMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 8.26% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.88% | 13.82% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.64% | 18.68% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 16.76% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 18.69% | -1.81% |